[Paladin2]

Yep, he voted for it before he voted against it when he knew his vote wasn’t necessary to pass it. Same old, same ol’.

[dragnet2]

Who cares about the minor details? ☺

[Hildy]

NO, he is not the same old same old. Everything he does, everything he says is well thought out and based in logic. He does not cowtow to emotions..the beginning of TPA was all emotion...he explained, very articulately why he supported it..and now he articulated why he voted no. He is a breath of fresh air.

[trebb]

Yep, he voted for it before he voted against it when he knew his vote wasn’t necessary to pass it. Same old, same ol’.

Yep - formed an opinion with partial info and won't let facts get in the way because the opinion feels comfortable and it opens the door to trash a conservative and give us a Hillary or worse to follow Obama, which we all know is the principled thing to do...- same old same ol'

[ducks1944]

UR so right he voted for it and then when it came back for another vote it only took 51 votes and he could vote no and tell us he voted against bill. He is no better than Rubio…...