Words no longer have meaning if an Exchange that is not established by a State is established by the State. It is hard to come up with a clearer way to limit tax credits to state Exchanges than to use the words established by the State. And it is hard to come up with a reason to include the words by the State other than the purpose of limiting credits to state Exchanges.
[T]he plain, obvious, and rational meaning of a statute is always to be preferred to any curious, narrow, hidden sense that nothing but the exigency of a hard case and the ingenuity and study of an acute and powerful intellect would discover.
The somersaults of statutory interpretation they have performed (penalty means tax, further [Medicaid] payments to the State means only incremental Medicaid payments to the State, established by the State means not established by the State) will be cited by litigants endlessly, to the confusion of honest jurisprudence. And the cases will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites.
Scalia is one of those radical right wing extremist judges who thinks the law says what it says./s
All jurisprudence is outcome oriented. The law and constitution haven't had any meaning other than that voiced by appellate courts and bureaucracies, for the last 100 years.