Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

D.A.'s office reaches partial settlement in civil forfeiture suit (Philadelphia)
The Inquirer ^ | 24 June, 2015 | Jeremy Roebuck

Posted on 06/25/2015 10:34:25 AM PDT by SZonian

The Philadelphia District Attorney's Office has agreed to change two of the most scrutinized aspects of its civil forfeiture program - a $6-million-a-year juggernaut aimed at taking cash and property out of the hands of drug dealers.

In federal court filings this week, city lawyers agreed to limit their practice of barring homeowners from properties tied up in forfeiture proceedings until the case has made its way before a judge.

Prosecutors also said they would no longer enforce several controversial requirements routinely included in deals struck with property owners to settle forfeiture cases. Those include restrictions blocking relatives accused of crimes from living at the property, granting the state pre-approval on all new owners or tenants, and limiting the rights of owners to fight off future forfeiture efforts.

The policy shifts come amid recent calls from some lawmakers to overhaul Pennsylvania's forfeiture laws, and growing national scrutiny of the city's forfeiture program, which critics say has too often caught innocent people in its dragnet. Last year, four Philadelphia property owners whose houses or cars had been seized filed a civil rights lawsuit in federal court challenging several aspects of the program.

(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: civilforfeiture; drugs; drugwar; forfeiture; wod
Don't know that I believe the parent's story about not knowing their 22 year old son was dealing drugs...but seizing property without just compensation is a big problem for me.
1 posted on 06/25/2015 10:34:25 AM PDT by SZonian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SZonian

All these draconian laws have done NOTHING to reduce drug availability and arguably nothing for drug use.

Drugs are still cheap and readily available.


2 posted on 06/25/2015 10:40:03 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Agreed.

This is but a sample of how out of control this “war” has become...the Constitution be damned.


3 posted on 06/25/2015 10:42:02 AM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

But now these laws are big money for big govt. The govt needs illegal drugs to fund their operations.


4 posted on 06/25/2015 10:43:32 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SZonian

I own 32 acres of field and undeveloped forest. What is to stop them from planting a single plant somewhere on my property, unbeknown to me, and then coming by a month later and “finding” it and taking my property?


5 posted on 06/25/2015 10:53:53 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Nothing...and that concerns me as well since I am currently looking for land back East for my post CA homestead.


6 posted on 06/25/2015 11:01:07 AM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

The Government, in league with environmentalist property grabbers, might do just THAT!


7 posted on 06/25/2015 11:03:57 AM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SZonian
"a $6-million-a-year juggernaut aimed at taking cash and property out of the hands of drug dealers citizens who haven't received due process"

Fixed it

8 posted on 06/25/2015 11:14:05 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

“The govt needs illegal drugs to fund their operations.”

Yep, asset forfeiture is, in part, the drug dealers paying their “tax” to operate in the crime boss’s territory.


9 posted on 06/25/2015 11:15:56 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

They don’t even need to “plant” the plant. Marijuana grows wild in all 48 contiguous states. So chances are, if your parcel is fertile and large enough, they might find a few stray plants if they just look hard enough.


10 posted on 06/25/2015 11:17:31 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

I also live in the heart of “Cornbread Mafia” territory.

(google it)


11 posted on 06/25/2015 11:25:08 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Oh yeah, I’ve heard of those guys but never by that name. When good farmers go bad :)


12 posted on 06/25/2015 11:36:02 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
"a $6-million-a-year juggernaut aimed at taking cash and property out of the hands of drug dealers citizens who haven't received due process"

Fixed it

Yup, "drug dealers" was just a con to get the suckers to bend over and take it.

13 posted on 06/25/2015 12:21:45 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

“I own 32 acres of field and undeveloped forest. What is to stop them from planting a single plant somewhere on my property, unbeknown to me, and then coming by a month later and “finding” it and taking my property?”

Nothing, they’ve done it before. Just ask the Forest Service.


14 posted on 06/25/2015 2:27:55 PM PDT by dljordan (WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

Yes, there is a certain california case that comes to mind. They really wanted his property.


15 posted on 06/25/2015 2:36:24 PM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson