Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Colonel_Flagg
Today the Supreme Court once again took it upon itself to stand athwart God's Law.

Had this decision been made 45 years after the 14th Amendment (1913) rather than today, do you think the Senate would not be in consultation with the House to kick the asses of those five justices off the Supreme Court?

Today, the Senate stands in awe of what MSNBC, Politico, WaPo, NYT and especially Obama. . . etc. say of it.

55 posted on 06/26/2015 2:50:32 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie
Today the Supreme Court once again took it upon itself to stand athwart God's Law.

Had we elected people who stood on principle, the Supreme Court would surely not have the makeup it has today, rendering the rest of your argument moot.

I am in full agreement that we have a Supreme Court who, as I said earlier today, yesterday thought it could write law and today thinks it can play God.

67 posted on 06/26/2015 3:30:22 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("No social transformation without representation." - Justice Antonin Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson