Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too
Twist 120 years of past proven practice.

Twist several thousand years of traditional marriage. No really. Go ahead. Give it a shot.

61 posted on 06/26/2015 3:40:51 PM PDT by dware (Yeah, so? What are we going to do about it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: dware
You deflected.

Marriage is not mentioned in the Constitution, so there is nothing proposed to twist. The method of choosing Senators is, before and after the 17th, and my draft repeal of the 17th.

Suppose that my draft repeal amendment is successfully proposed out of the convention. Does it pass textual muster? If ratified, on what grounds do you think it might be challenged? On what grounds do you anticipate Congress will ignore or bypass it?

-PJ

69 posted on 06/26/2015 4:36:52 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson