Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HomerBohn

Interposition, there is nothing to nullify.


2 posted on 06/27/2015 8:07:04 AM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76
I was pondering yesterday, the oath taken to support, defend and protect the Constitution ... which sounds good .... except ....

When the Constitution contains truly vile and evil things (abortion/murder) I think Romans 13:4 can give us some wisdom:

4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.

Now, Chapter and (this) verse deal with a single entity .. the magistrate ... but "the powers that be " are identified up front, so ...

When an entity no longer is for our good (v 4), I BELIEVE we no longer need be afraid for that one no longer cares for My Good

I've pondered often the religious/spiritual atmosphere that must have existed during the running up to the American Revolution

How did the pulpits speak to those men that determined it was a worhy cause to go to war against their own government (still under British rule at the time) ?

I think Romans 13:4 was the way preachers preached for personal Liberty and Freedom to be won


Back to the oath taken for office ...

If the Constitution contains such vile and murderous clauses like abortion and the disfunctional queer marriage .... how can any righteous man take it ?

Which is what we're being set up for and we have a scant 16 months to realize this and DO something about it

Perhaps an ammendment to support, defend and protect AS ORIGINALLY WRITTEN (or something)


Thrown out for discussion and the clock is ticking.

18 posted on 06/27/2015 8:29:08 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

The states could refuse to issue marriage licenses now that the feds have taken it over. Start another word for man-wife marriage.


33 posted on 06/27/2015 8:47:39 AM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone all iCommentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

The states could refuse to issue marriage licenses now that the feds have taken it over. Start another word for man-wife marriage.


35 posted on 06/27/2015 8:49:15 AM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone all iCommentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

Indeed there is, Our state can and should prohibit the issuing of marriage licences, and tell the court they may issue their own, but such licences will not be recognized by the state.

That is a passive act of non-cooperation, precisely what nullification is.

Washington’s Corrupt employees in black robes may be able to punish us for what we do but not for what we don’t do.


68 posted on 06/27/2015 10:40:24 AM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson