Posted on 06/27/2015 12:15:11 PM PDT by 5thGenTexan
Exactly. Jenner is a sexual deviant who is turned on by his own image as a woman. He’s already said he’s not interested in men so his sexual attraction is toward women but especially, toward himself as a woman. He’s taking his sexual gratification inward.
YEp....
No. Same sex marriage has been determined to be a right across the board - no contingencies.
Although the right to bear arms is guaranteed, the right to conceal or open carry is not. It is a privilege which you must qualify for.
You MUST keep in mind that Obamacare was positioned by Congress in the tax code, if you want to make sense of what happened.
Concerning your points, the tax code makes the presumption that it's about taxes. So - within the tax code - it can say "penalty," but it ALWAYS has to do with increasing a TAX.
Same with "State" - it's the federal tax code, and the federal definition of "State" - as quoted by none other than Scalia in his dissent - INCLUDES the "District of Columbia," of which the "federal" government IS the government thereof.
The liar wasn't Roberts - it was the Democrats who forced Obamacare through with those double-meaning terms.
That's why the same Roberts made so much sense on the gay marriage dissent - he's doing what conservatives want, he's interpreting the ACTUAL law.
Noting that the issue of same-sex marriage and thread title mentioning Obamacare are two different issues, the following material addresses the Court’s 10th Amendment-ignoring legalization of same-sex marriage. (What am I overlooking?)
I’m glad that your friend mentioned consistency of laws between states. Not only did activist justices not only wrongly ignore 10th Amendment-protect state sovereignty to prohibit constitutional unprotected gay marriage, the states having never amended the Constitution to expressly protect gay marriage, but please consider the following.
The argument by pro-gay activist justices that marriage laws needed to be consistent across the states wrongly ignores that the Founding States had given the power to make such decisions uniquely to Congress as evidenced by the Constitution’s Full Faith and Credit Clause of Section 1 of Article IV.
In fact, Section 2 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is evidently still in effect, Congress officially clarifying that the states do not have to recognize gay marriages from other states.
DOMA:
This Act may be cited as the “Defense of Marriage Act”.
No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship.
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word 'marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word 'spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.
So pro-gay activist justices forcing gay marriage on the states in the nam name of consistency seems to be in direct conflict with Congress’s constitutional authority to decide the effect of one state’s records in other states.
But also note that corrupt, RINO-controlled Congress is probably elated that activist justices have done its dirty work for it.
NOT JUST HELL BUT HELL NO. There is ZERO chance of equal protection for concealed carry. The ONLY way there would be state by state gun laws is if they make the laws as strict as New York or San Francisco.
The Law comes out of Humpty Dumbty Robert's and Kennedy's mouths.
Yep. Now the Sc just makes $#!t up as they go along.
If we ever get Mark Levin’s constitutional convention, they’ve got to address the Supreme Court.
I think Jenner reflects what most of Hollywood is....deviant ...they just hide it for the most part.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.