Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rbg81
An 18 year old should not get into trouble for having relations with a 16 year old.

Why not? Do you think it's good for unmarried 18- and 16-year-olds to be having sex, making babies, and spreading disease? What about 15- and 14-year-olds? 13?

We're talking about something that's wrong and has significant bad consequences, both for the participants and for society. Some kind of "get in trouble" - a fine, community service - might make some of them think a little.

20 posted on 06/28/2015 5:37:10 AM PDT by Tax-chick (You know I don't find this stuff amusing anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

I should have qualified by saying “legal trouble”. Legal and moral are different animals.

From what I’ve personally observed, a lot of people lose their virginity by 16 (or claim to) and almost everyone has by 20. The vast majority of boys are eager to “lose it”. For me, it happened at 17, but would have done it earlier had the opportunity presented itself. Girls are another issue. Is that a sexist double standard? Absolutely, but the sexes are obviously different.

That being said, as an adult, I would never encourage anyone under 21 to go out and have sex. But it is stupid for a young man to be labeled a sex offender because he had relations with someone 2, 3 or even 4 years younger than he was.


24 posted on 06/28/2015 5:49:00 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson