I predicted this. I kept telling everyone that one day Sandusky would get an apology for the inconvenience and a complimentary young boy for his troubles.
Well, it’s right there in the Constitution.
No prob. When every member of congress offers up their kids first.
Related articles:
Obama: Ditch Religious Convictions About Same-Sex Marriage Already
http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/26/obama-ditch-religious-convictions-about-same-sex-marriage-already/#sthash.RibDYXEi.dpuf
Business and professions will suffer if same-sex marriage arrives
http://www.mercatornet.com/conjugality/view/business-and-professions-will-suffer-if-same-sex-marriage-arrives/
DOC FACES BOOT FOR CITING ‘GAY’ HEALTH DANGERS
http://www.wnd.com/2015/06/doc-faces-boot-for-citing-gay-health-dangers/
Should We Lower the Age of Consent to Protect Teenagers?
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/11/18/lowering_the_age_of_consent_u_k_public_health_advocate_john_ashton_wants.html
HOW #LOVEWINS – Hidden Camera: Gays Admit They’re Not “Born That Way,” Most Were Raped By Gays As Children
http://patdollard.com/2015/06/hidden-camera-gays-admit-theyre-not-born-that-way-most-were-raped-by-gays-as-children/
Inconsistent Same-Sex Marriage Advocates
http://str.typepad.com/weblog/2012/06/inconsistent-same-sex-marriage-advocates.html
“In Australia, same-sex marriage activists are upset that polyamorists are trying to jump on their equality bandwagon.”
The Pink Swastika
http://www.thepinkswastika.com/
THE SILENCING: Paper Will Limit Anti-Gay Marriage Op-Eds
http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/26/the-silencing-paper-will-limit-anti-gay-marriage-op-eds/
Churches Could Lose Tax-Exempt Status For Refusing To Accommodate Gay Marriage, Warn Dissenting Supreme Court Justices
http://www.hngn.com/articles/104633/20150627/churches-could-lose-tax-exempt-status-for-refusing-to-accommodate-gay-marriage-warn-dissenting-supreme-court-justices.htm
Momentum grows to scrap Pentagon’s ban on transgender troops
http://thehill.com/policy/defense/246304-momentum-grows-to-scrap-pentagons-ban-on-transgender-troops
SCOTUS DECLARES WAR ON MARRIAGE AND FAMILY
http://barbwire.com/2015/06/26/scotus-declares-war-on-marriage-and-family/
It’s Time to Legalize Polygamy
Why group marriage is the next horizon of social liberalism.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/gay-marriage-decision-polygamy-119469.html?hp=r4_4#.VY_37flVhBf
Pretty predictable, I think. NAMBLA used to march in most Gay Pride parades. I remember telling a gay guy back in the ‘80s that it was ridiculous expecting credibility so long as that was the case, and it was after they started shutting NAMBLA out that gays started making some serious strides toward general popularity.
Personally, I do not believe the ties have been severed anywhere but publicly, so not surprising that, now that the biggest gay goals have been generally achieved, the pedophiles are moving up for their turn.
Gen 9:13 - 17
I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth. Gen 9:14 And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud: Tools specific to Gen 9:15 Gen 9:15 And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh. Tools specific to Gen 9:16 Gen 9:16 And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth. Gen 9:17 And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.
I wonder if God will rescind the rainbow covenant he promised Noah, since the queers has co-oped it as their symbol.
Should We Lower the Age of Consent to Protect Teenagers?
Slate ^ | 25 June 2015 | Amanda Hess
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3305231/posts
July 2, 2000-
“The professional association of psychiatrists, also known as the APA (American Psychiatrists Association) has sent a signal that it too will support the “normalization” of sex with children. They quietly changed their diagnostic manual a few years back so that a person no longer has a “disorder” simply because he molests children. To be diagnosed as “disordered,” the psychiatrists must look to the psyche of the adult. If the adult does not feel anxious about the relationship with the child or if he is not impaired in his work or social relationships, then he has no “disorder.” ...
What do you mean, I can't sign my stablemate up for healthcare?
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/kennedy-v-louisiana-no-07-343
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional the Louisiana statute that allowed the death penalty for the rape of a child where the victim did not die. In Kennedy v. Louisiana, the Court held that all such laws, where the crime was against an individual and no murder was committed, were contrary to the national consensus restricting the death penalty to the worst offenses.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_v._Louisiana
The power of the (individual) states to impose the death penalty against an individual for committing a crime that did not result in the death of the victim is now limited to crimes against the state (federal government) (e.g., espionage, treason).
Actually, it should be the other way around. The federal government is so corrupt and degenerate that its power of death should be strictly limited, lest people like the current corrupt bunch decide to legally murder their political opponents. Like the Democrat congressman who called for the death penalty against those skeptical of man made global warming.
Does anyone believe that dozens of Democrats would be all in favor of legally murdering Republicans if they could? Would RINOs even rise to the defense of a conservative on trial for his life for being a conservative? I doubt it.
Sick...and getting sicker folks(to quote the legendary Bob Grant).
I don’t get it. As citizens of US what right don’t they have? They are already equal under the law. Do we need special Fat People rights? Religious people rights? Nerd rights? etc. There are all sorts of people who experience disdain and soft bigotry toward them. But they all have the same rights under the law.
When government refuses to protect the citizenry against criminals, or worse, takes the side of criminals against the citizenry, vigilantism results.
Unlike its reputation, vigilantism remains peaceful until it is forced to be violent. Many legal things are done by vigilantes until they have no more choice.
So the equation is simple: if the government refuses to stop or punish or execute pedophiles, it is up to the citizenry to do so. And if they are brought to trial for killing a pedophile, most juries will acquit via nullification.
Fear not!
It HAS fallen into an abyss.
Liberals denied it and now will deny that you predicted it
Yep. Here we go.
Bump