I would avoid bringing any 2nd amendment case in front of this group. I’m convinced Roberts has been compromised. If “state” doesn’t mean state then “shall not be infringed” can mean “easily be infringed”.
We thought we had a conservative majority. We don’t and that is VERY dangerous.
This court very definitely would arbitrarily apply a totally different standard to any gun case - but didn’t the DOMA ruling set a precedent whereby going to the supreme court would probably be unnecessary? The 2nd amendment is alot clearer and unambiguous than some equal protection clause.