“He is considered unsupportable by 66% of the primary voters.”
First of all, he’s pro-life. He’s also pro-America... Unless Walker or Cruse can break out, Trump might be our best hope.
And regarding the 66% number, where did you dig that up? Clearly it’s not true...
Not in a million years would I vote for Trump.
First off, he is NOT prolife, not even close.
What you hear is him saying “I am pro-life” and claiming that in 2011, at age 65, just as he was preparing to run for president as a republican, that he switched from pro-choice, to pro-life.
But Trump is on tape revealing that he not only disagrees with the GOP platform of no exceptions for rape and incest, but that he is OK with early abortions, it is just late term abortions that he is against.
Regarding the 66% that you say is “Clearly it’s not true...”
“WASHINGTON — You’ve seen the polls that measure Republican voters first choice for the party’s 2016 presidential nomination. But there’s another measure of public perception — this one on the negative side — with pollsters asking voters to list candidates they could not see supporting.
Pollsters for NBC News/Wall Street Journal asked that very question of GOP primary voters”
“To the question of which candidates could you not see voting for, Jindal was selected by just 28 percent of those polled.
That’s far lower than real estate mogul Donald Trump’s, chosen by 66 percent of voters as definitely not their candidate, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, selected by 55 percent and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the non-choice of 49 percent.”