Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10/20/2014: Idaho city’s ordinance tells pastors to marry gays or go to jail
The Washington Times ^ | October 20, 2014 | Cheryl K. Chumley

Posted on 06/29/2015 1:11:25 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Coeur d‘Alene, Idaho, city officials have laid down the law to Christian pastors within their community, telling them bluntly via an ordinance that if they refuse to marry homosexuals, they will face jail time and fines.

The dictate comes on the heels of a legal battle with Donald and Evelyn Knapp, ordained ministers who own the Hitching Post wedding chapel in the city, but who oppose gay marriage, The Daily Caller reported.

A federal judge recently ruled that the state’s ban on gay marriage was unconstitutional, while the city of Coeur d‘Alene has an ordinance that prevents discrimination based on sexual preference.

The Supreme Court’s recent refusal to take on gay rights’ appeals from five states has opened the doors for same-sex marriages to go forth.

The Knapps were just asked by a gay couple to perform their wedding ceremony, The Daily Caller reported.

“On Friday, a same-sex couple asked to be married by the Knapps, and the Knapps politely declined,” The Daily Signal reported. “The Knapps now face a 180-day jail term and a $1,000 fine for each day they decline to celebrate the same-sex wedding.”(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Idaho
KEYWORDS: ac; fascism; gaymarriage; gays; homosexualagenda; idaho; persecution; ssm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: denydenydeny

Start to wonder? Liberalism/Progressivism is all about making the state supreme. Religion stands in the way. America is the target.


21 posted on 06/29/2015 4:55:40 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

Let us follow Alabama’s lead on this (with my own little twist)...

Pass laws that remove marriage from the purview of the State; States should get out of the marriage business altogether.

This then would place the “licensure” onus on the Federal Government. Anyone wanting such benefits of marriage must obtain permission from the Federal Government. After all, marriage has specific benefits found in the ^Federal^ IRS code.

Now, for the twist! Have each marriage license subject to review and approval by the SCOTUS, signed off (original signature required) by one of the SCOTUS judges.

It is their decision, let them live with it.


22 posted on 06/29/2015 5:10:42 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

“Liberalism/Progressivism is all about making the state supreme. Religion stands in the way. America is the target.”......

There is no need to wonder any longer. This country has let itself be consumed and destructed by the liberals and so called progressives. The time for resistance and civil war has passed and WE let it happen.


23 posted on 06/29/2015 5:12:17 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

And, really, we (social conservatives) did not see this decision coming?

Even after the courts’ nullification of California’s duly-passed-by-the-vote-of-the-populous Proposition 8?


24 posted on 06/29/2015 5:14:01 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I guess this city must be the San Fran of Idaho. I guess even in Idaho there are Liberal morons...


25 posted on 06/29/2015 5:14:06 AM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 20yearvet
Make sure there is lots of reporting on the hunger strike, but no violence.

That won't happen. The MSM won't report. It doesn't fit the "narrative". Those people in jail would effectively cease to exist.

26 posted on 06/29/2015 5:19:53 AM PDT by Flick Lives ("I'm just a stranger in a strange land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

In anticipation of this exact legal situation, I have advised my own church to inform all clergy to immediately cease conducting marriage ceremonies as agents of the State. This is EXACTLY what they have allowed themselves to become when they sign a marriage certificate or license after presiding over pronouncing a couple to be married.

Instead, clergy should clearly delineate between secular marriage as defined by the State and God’s marriage covenant. It was a mistake to commingle the two and now the reason has become crystal clear. Churches must aggressively assert that the marriage covenant is strictly an ecclesiastical matter that is outside of the powers of government to intrude upon and fully protected by the First Amendment.

Should a couple come to the clergy to be married, the clergy should explain that he can officiate at a ceremony for the marriage covenant and to explain the terms and conditions of that covenant. Only after he is satisfied that he has the authority to conduct the ceremony should he agree to do so.

Prior to the ceremony, the couple would go to the government to complete the secular requirements for being “married” as government would define it.

Let the things of Caesar return to Caesar and the things of God return to God.

People who do not know God, nor care to know, do not want to enter into this covenant anyway. Nor can they.

But know this: that those who planned this coup, this redefinition of “marriage”, crave God’s approval of their sins far more than they desire to participate in the institution of marriage. They are exactly like the people described in Revelation 22:15, who are refused entrance to the Kingdom because of their willful sins.


27 posted on 06/29/2015 5:20:33 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
These battles should be fought on freedom of speech, no freedom of religion grounds.

That would cede this battle to the enemy. The majority opinion said that the religious could talk about SS marriage, implying that the 1st Amendment does not protect the exercise of religion, not just talk. The majority has already decided you have free speech and are allowed to complain as you are forced to bless homo weddings.

The right thing to do is have the Rep candidates (and maybe surprise Dem or two) come forward and declare that state marriage confers no benefits or those will gradually be removed. Then record religious marriages in state records. If religions refuse to marry homosexuals then those homos are out of luck.

28 posted on 06/29/2015 5:31:05 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet into FlixNet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: plangent

Californians have been moving to Idaho in droves bringing some their deviant lifestyles with them.


29 posted on 06/29/2015 5:34:39 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s not the first time Christians have been told to either turn their backs on their faith or suffer at the hands of the secular authorities. Martyrs are made this way.


30 posted on 06/29/2015 5:37:51 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s getting to the point where the penalty for killing our oppressors is less than the penalty for passively resisting them. I think our oppressors will be greatly surprised when the shooting starts.


31 posted on 06/29/2015 5:55:30 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Invite them to pre-marital counseling to review the Scriptures and prepare for christian marriage before offering an answer.


32 posted on 06/29/2015 5:56:23 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Christians” have been slumbering in the thought that all these vile fags wanted is to be left alone. We’ve slept too long. They’re bringing the fight to us and their objective is to force “Christian” organizations to openly embrace homosexuality or be outlawed. It’s past time for us to get off our sanctimonious butts and defend the faith.


33 posted on 06/29/2015 6:04:24 AM PDT by LouAvul (Liberalism: more than just a mental illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Recall election. Vote them out.


34 posted on 06/29/2015 6:16:10 AM PDT by Calamari (Pass enough laws and everyone is guilty of something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Yes. Just cause it’s legal doesn’t make it compulsory. People are still entitled to their religious convictions -as Justice Kennedy pointed out in the majority decision.


35 posted on 06/29/2015 7:31:32 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The SCROTUS decision was supposedly based on the 14th Amendment's "Equal Protection" clause.

Will Muslim Imams also be required to perform homosexual marriages?

If not, the SCROTUS decision cannot stand.

36 posted on 06/29/2015 9:06:41 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
Hi.

SCROTUS

Has a nice ring to it.

5.56mm

37 posted on 06/29/2015 9:14:23 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RginTN
"knew this was coming didn’t know it would happen so quickly!"

Might want to check the date again. This happened last year, and it's not a church. It's a regular licensed business.

38 posted on 06/29/2015 9:24:00 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie
"...the Hollywood boy raper ethics of the producers who were raping the two Corey’s-—..."

Amazing how that blockbuster bit of news went straight into the memory hole.

America found it newsworthy. The media, oddly, did not.

39 posted on 06/29/2015 9:33:16 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan ('Zionists crept into my home and stole my shoe' - Headline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Many knew this before 2014. Actually, many knew this right after Jesus said it...

5.56mm

40 posted on 06/29/2015 9:41:29 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson