Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: proust

Here we go....

L


2 posted on 06/29/2015 7:15:08 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker
Ok, the decision says:

(b) The Fourteenth Amendment requires a State to license a marriage between two people of the same sex.

The state, not individuals. It also says::

(1) The fundamental liberties protected by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause extend to certain personal choices central to individual dignity and autonomy, including intimate choices defining personal identity and beliefs.

Isn't this woman an individual who requires autonomy for personal choices defining her identity and beliefs?

And, in their words, finally:

Finally, it must be emphasized that religions, and those who adhere to religious doctrines, may continue to advocate with utmost, sincere conviction that, by divine pre- cepts, same-sex marriage should not be condoned. The First Amendment ensures that religious organizations and persons are given proper protection as they seek to teach the principles that are so fulfilling and so central to their lives and faiths, and to their own deep aspirations to continue the family structure they have long revered.

20 posted on 06/29/2015 7:44:39 PM PDT by Kenny (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson