Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JSDude1

The expressions “overkill” and “don’t throw the baby out with the bath water” come to mind.

Inevitably when one of these articles is posted, some poster comments that only 2% of the population is gay and that only some of them will get married. So it seems a little over the top to think that the federal government and all 50 states will throw out centuries of laws in reaction to a fraction of the gays now being able to get married.


12 posted on 06/29/2015 11:05:45 PM PDT by ConstantSkeptic (Be careful about preconceptions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConstantSkeptic

Marriage law needed reform, anyway. Now we have an opportunity to set marriage law straight (no pun intended).

If people could choose from a series of contracts, instead of a one-size-fits-all marriage agreement, then, for example, one couple might prefer a contract agreeing to share all financial debt, whereas another might want a contract agreeing that each spouse shouldn’t be held responsible for the other spouse’s debt. Sort of like prenuptial agreements for everyone.


15 posted on 06/29/2015 11:15:45 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: ConstantSkeptic

So it seems a little over the top to think that the federal government and all 50 states will throw out centuries of laws

Seems like the SCOTUS did just that.


26 posted on 06/30/2015 3:26:16 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson