Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ican'tbelieveit

I think it is similar to how they (fed) wanted the states to provide their own exchanges, and have mandated that the over 50 employers MUST provide insurance. They (fed) WANT the small employers to offer GROUP health insurance. This would keep the employees of small employers off of the 0bamacare exchanges, both national and state. So to encourage that, they are PUNISHING small employers who say, “We will not offer a group health insurance plan, but we will help you with your premiums to get individual/family coverage on the exchanges”.

So they are penalizing small employers in an effort to FORCE them to get group insurance instead of letting them help their employees with premium costs.


39 posted on 06/30/2015 1:53:24 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: NEMDF

Now you’re talkin and you’ve got it RIGHT IMO!!! Neither the article made it as clear as this comment of your’s has, not any of the prior discussion. I think you have completely pulled the covers of the intended purpose of this IRS rule making.


56 posted on 06/30/2015 4:27:24 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Help Stamp Out Pernicious Progressives and Arrogant Activists With Their Liberalism!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson