Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/01/2015 10:50:23 AM PDT by QT3.14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: QT3.14


2 posted on 07/01/2015 10:51:03 AM PDT by QT3.14 (How long before 'Dixie' cups are banned?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

“There is no federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage”.....Yet.


3 posted on 07/01/2015 10:53:28 AM PDT by jettester (I got paid to break 'em - not fly 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Of course, she wouldn’t say absolutely anything at all...no matter how untrue...to get confirmed to the cushiest affirmative action job in the land.


4 posted on 07/01/2015 10:54:04 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

...because I haven’t created it yet


6 posted on 07/01/2015 10:54:17 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Wait you mean she lied in her confirmation hearings?

I’m shocked - shocked, I say!


8 posted on 07/01/2015 10:54:52 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Like ALL LEFTISTS she lies to get into the power seat she craves. Then she does the evil that burbles up out of her black heart.


9 posted on 07/01/2015 10:56:26 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Obviously she has “evolved.”


10 posted on 07/01/2015 10:57:20 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (The "end of history" will be Worldwide Judaic Theocracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
Leftists lie.

What else is new?

11 posted on 07/01/2015 10:58:15 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Of course there isn’t. But she had to lie to advance the agenda. Ends justify the means.


13 posted on 07/01/2015 10:59:27 AM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Sadly Republican senators never bork democrat SC nominees. They give them their votes


14 posted on 07/01/2015 10:59:29 AM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
Confirmation Hearings...Kagan...“There Is No Federal Constitutional Right to Same-Sex Marriage”

Quick! Turn this sound bite into a news story juxtaposed with her recent vote, and put it on constant rotation 24-7 for the next several weeks! Lead the News cycle with it!

We can use our control of the News Services and entertainment industry to push back against this decision!!!

That is if we owned any of them. Nope, the LIBERALS could do this, but we cannot.

15 posted on 07/01/2015 11:00:30 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
And ... more SCOTUS precedent ...

"The Constitution does not confer a fundamental right upon homosexuals to engage in sodomy." ... Chief Justice Burger, Bowers v. Hardwick (srsly!)

17 posted on 07/01/2015 11:02:47 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

She didn’t “evolve”. She lied to get the Republicans to confirm her.


20 posted on 07/01/2015 11:07:52 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (INTOLERANCE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Progressives lie. It’s what they do!


21 posted on 07/01/2015 11:09:33 AM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

People don’t understand Cultural Marxism. She knows there’s no constitutional right , but that doesn’t stop her from creating one out of thin air


22 posted on 07/01/2015 11:10:12 AM PDT by almcbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
"Marriage has got historic, religious and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman." Hillary Clinton, January 2000

"Do you think New York State should recognize gay marriage?" "No." Hillary Clinton, 2002

"I believe marriage is not just a bond but a sacred bond between a man and a woman." Hillary Clinton, 2004

"Never mind." Emily Litella, 1976


25 posted on 07/01/2015 11:22:07 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
So she's a fraud...that just gives her DC street cred.
26 posted on 07/01/2015 11:24:05 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14; All
Thank you for referencing that article QT3.14. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

"Senator John Cornyn: Do you believe that there is a federal constitutional right to samesex marriage?"

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

While I appreciate Moonbattery’s blog, Senator Cornyn’s PC, possibly staged question is another example why the ill-conceived 17th Amendment (17A) should never have been ratified. More about 17A shortly.

With all due respect to Senator Cornyn, all that he or any citizen has to do is read the Constitution to verify that the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect gay marriage. The same with the so-called “right” to have an abortion.

In fact, regardless that activist justices used the 14th Amendment as their excuse to bluff that gay marriage is a right, they wrongly ignored the following. They ignored that the congressional record shows that John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, had clarified that the 14th Amendment applies only those rights that the states have amended the constitution to expressly protect to the states.

“Mr. Speaker, this House may safely follow the example of the makers of the Constitution and the builders of the Republic, by passing laws for enforcing all the privileges and immunities of the United States as guaranteed by the amended Constitution and expressly enumerated in the Constitution [emphasis added].” —John Bingham, Congressional Globe, House of Representatives, 42nd Congress, 1st Session. (See lower half of third column.)

And since the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect gay marriage, Obama’s puppet justices actually had no enumerated protections for gay marriage to throw at the states.

The Supreme Court had put it this way.

“3. The Constitution was written to be understood by the voters; its words and phrases were used in their normal and ordinary as distinguished from technical meaning; where the intention is clear, there is no room for construction and no excuse for interpolation or addition.” —United States v. Sprague, 1931.

Again, the Constitution is silent about about gay marriage and abortion.

The 17th Amendment needs to disappear, and corrupt senators, activist justices, and a lawless president along with it.

31 posted on 07/01/2015 12:05:49 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Impeach her. This wasn’t the only thing she lied about during the confirmation hearings.


32 posted on 07/01/2015 12:11:59 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Congress can impeach a judge for “bad behavior”. Why aren’t they??


34 posted on 07/01/2015 1:21:27 PM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson