Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mac_truck

It does not take anything away. Probable cause is always been the basis of an arrest, the same applies with a traffic stop. And what is probable cause”? It is more than mere suspicion, but less than certainty.


24 posted on 07/03/2015 6:28:25 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: sport
It does not take anything away.

Lol...whut?

26 posted on 07/03/2015 6:38:37 AM PDT by mac_truck (Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: sport
In practice, probable cause is whatever the judge accepts as sufficient supporting evidence. In this case, the judge accepts ZILCH, absence of evidence, as sufficient.

It's generally not practical to litigate this type of judicial error, because the legal/trial process moves faster than the appeal process. Judges are heavily biased against defendant at this stage of the process, and openly deviate from the law. Police, prosecutors and trial judges are a team, with close to zero probability of being penalized for violation of due process, as long as the violations aren't egregious, "shock the conscience" level.

28 posted on 07/03/2015 6:42:16 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson