If I realllly need a ride somewhere perhaps I can just car-jack the nearest patrol car..?
Appointed by Barack Obama.
And the wonder why they are sometimes shot, definitely disrespected and hated...
fascism is as fascism does.
If they come here they better be in full body armor.
EXEMPT from that.
What is the purpose of Law, when the Higher Class
of Patricians and their lackeys (LEO and criminal illegal
killers porting incurable diseases, bombs, and narcotics)
can do what they want, when they want, without
any (none, zed, zero) accountability?
"When the law no longer protects you from the corrupt,
but protects the corrupt from you -
you know your nation is doomed."
-Ayn Rand
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream.
It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same,
or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children
and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free."
President Ronald Reagan
Wrong amendment.
Should have gone after the secure in person and papers or no search without warrant
Why doesn’t anything exciting like this happen to me??/ I need the money, and believe thee me, I would extract my pint of blood out of those idiots....and where the hell do we keep coming up with these inane judges....sheesh!!!
From the judge’s decision:
In the present case, various officers of the HPD and NLVPD entered into and occupied Linda’s and Michael’s home for an unspecified amount of time (seemingly nine hours), but certainly for less than twenty-four hours. The relevant questions are thus whether municipal police should be considered soldiers, and whether the time they spent in the house could be considered quartering. To both questions, the answer must be no.
I hold that a municipal police officer is not a soldier for purposes of the Third Amendment. This squares with the purpose of the Third Amendment because this was not a military intrusion into a private home, and thus the intrusion is more effectively protected by the Fourth Amendment. Because I hold that municipal officers are not soldiers for the purposes of this question, I need not reach the question of whether the occupation at issue in this case constitutes quartering, though I suspect it would not.
If they want the whole banana it’s time we gave it to them, starting with this pos. I can’t believe I’m even reading this especially on this day. Sic Semper Tyrannis.
Apparently the court feels the 3rd Amendment only applies when the govt doesn’t NEED to use your property.
If that were me there would be some cops looking over their shoulders every day for the rest of their short, miserable lives.
L
The judge only ruled that they weren’t soldiers being quartered under the 3rd Amendment. He didn’t rule what they did was OK under the 4th, or didn’t otherwise violate the citizen’s rights. The case wasn’t dismissed.
Why is a federal judge ruling on a local police home invasion anyway. Notice they charged the homeowner too.
This court ruling must be disobeyed. It is null and void. It is repugnant to the Constitution and is un-Constitutional on its face. Therefore we all have a duty to reject it.
I don’t care what a rogue court says. They don’t get to over-run a person’s house for whatever reason they concoct to rationalize such color-of-law illegal behavior.
if they have a legitimate reason (hard to imagine, but perhaps there might be one?)
then they will be welcomed in with open arms, fed, watered, and assisted as much as possible
if they just try to crash the place without permission or a legitimate reason, they will not be let in
Police should NEVER be allowed to act like an “occupying army” with the citizens as subjects of the occupation.
Law enforcement and military functions MUST be kept forever separate. Otherwise the law enforcer becomes - like I said - and occupation army.
I think this is actually a 4th Amendment issue. Even if the police are temporarily seizing your home, it is still different than the military quartering troops. The police will go for the exigent circumstance exception. The victim should challenge the Use of Force based upon the Graham v. Connor standard for use of force to be reasonable and necessary. Use of Force challenges are also based upon 4th Amendment case law, as the SCOTUS considers physical force against you to be a seizure of your physical well being
Come on my property without a warrant or an invitation and I don’t care what uniform you’re wearing. UPS and FedEx drivers excepted.
The right to bear arms shall not be infringed UTRRHT
People have a right to be safe and secure in their homes UTRRHT