[Gunslingr3]

They were complicit and you know what? If we held a vote on a package of government benefits, not one because it would be too easy to vote against the ‘other guy’, but a range of them and i’d bet money today our vote wouldn’t differ much from theirs at 60-40.

I've never been one to confuse what is right with what a majority votes.

I vote against Obama and his policies, why should that make me 'complicit' in them? Why should that allow creditors to then turn and seize my property?

[wiggen]

i never said they were right to seize anything did i? Merely stating what i believe to be true, that a vote here wold go no differently under the circumstances i outlined.