Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With Mega-Donor’s Technology, Cruz Campaign Promises to Turn Out More GOP Voters than Ever Before
National Review ^ | 07/08/2015 | Eliana Johnson

Posted on 07/08/2015 4:48:49 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Texas senator Ted Cruz has been called the Republican Barack Obama, and he is, indeed a young and brilliant conservative voice who’s taken Washington by storm since his election in 2012.

But the similarities don’t end there. In his quest for the presidency, Cruz is now looking to co-opt the tactic most credited with helping Obama win the White House in 2008 and 2012: Data analysis. The Cruz campaign hopes it can harness and build upon Team Obama’s famed ability to target and turn out voters in a nationwide race.

In 2012, Obama’s campaign won reelection by upending the turnout models pollsters and political analysts had relied upon for so long. African Americans, for example, turned out at a higher rate than whites for the first time in history, and they supported the president by an overwhelming majority.

The Cruz campaign is trying to pull off a similar feat with its base, tapping what it claims is a reservoir of dormant and disenchanted conservative voters, and it’s building on the methods developed by the Obama campaign to do so. Two top Cruz campaign aides spoke with National Review about the effort on the condition of anonymity. One of the aides says the push will result in “the most extensive grassroots program in American history.” Plenty of observers are skeptical that the Cruz campaign can deliver on that promise, but if they can, they’ll go into the primaries with a major advantage over their Republican rivals.

Cruz is now looking to co-opt the tactic most credited with helping Obama win the White House in 2008 and 2012: Data analysis. Cambridge Analytica, a data-analytics firm that has a handful of staffers embedded at Cruz campaign headquarters in Houston, is overseeing the program. It promises not only to target and motivate supporters, but also to identify voters who share characteristics with the campaign’s existing supporters — and what sorts of messages are most likely to persuade them. This is why Cruz’s team believes it can expand his base.

The company, according to several GOP sources, is owned in part by New York hedge-fund billionaire Robert Mercer, whose family is also donating generously to a super PAC supporting Cruz’s campaign. Cambridge Analytica has also done business with several other groups to which Mercer has been a generous donor: The super PAC Ending Spending, which is bankrolled primarily by TD Ameritrade founder Joe Ricketts, used the firm in the 2014 midterm election for projects in Oregon and Louisiana, as did the super PAC founded by former ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton.

“The toughest thing you can ever do in a campaign is to get the names of the people who are supporting you,” says another top Cruz aide. That’s true: For ages, campaigns have shelled out millions of dollars for lists of voters sympathetic to their candidates and causes. “It’s almost impossible to get the names of the people that may support you or that would be open to supporting you,” the aide says. And that’s where Cambridge Analytica comes in.

The company uses a proprietary methodology known as “behavioral microtargeting” that pinpoints voters based on psychographic qualities — a mishmash of one’s personal traits, attitudes, values, opinions, and general lifestyle — to determine how open someone might be to supporting, say, a candidate like Ted Cruz. Then, it uses the same process to ascertain which messages would be most likely to earn that person’s support. Cambridge Analytica harnesses over a hundred different categories of publicly available information — variables such as age, historical party affiliation, and magazine subscriptions — for each registered voter.

One of the Cruz aides describes the approaches that have bedeviled Republicans in the past. “We communicate the same way with people when it doesn’t correspond with how they psychologically process information,” the aide says. The example he offers: Most supporters of gun rights aren’t actually gun owners, so an ad showing a father and son out duck hunting may not be the most effective way to target potential Cruz voters who already have strong pro–Second Amendment leanings.

Though staffers on the Cruz campaign declined to speak on the record, Kellyanne Conway, a longtime Republican pollster who is frequently in touch with the campaign, says it is relying heavily on Cambridge Analytica’s technology, and that its use will give the GOP a leg up in 2016. “This is the first full presidential election cycle where Republicans will be relying on data analytics to reach voters,” Conway says.

One of the aides says the push will result in ‘the most extensive grassroots program in American history.’ That doesn’t mean Cruz will have an easy go of it. In fact, even his own team admits privately the effort will be something of an uphill battle. “It’s going to be harder for us than it was for President Obama,” says the aide, “because he was able to do it in very densely populated urban areas, whereas we are going to take that model and implement it in the suburbs, rural areas, and urban areas.”

Cruz’s contention that conservative voters have stayed home because they’ve been uninspired by the GOP’s moderate nominees has plenty of critics. Henry Olsen, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, has repeatedly attacked it in National Review, noting, for example, that the number of self-described conservatives in the U.S. has fluctuated between 33 and 40 percent over the last 40 years, but has never surpassed that, meaning a Republican nominee has always had to attract independent voters to win the White House.

Approximately 7 million fewer whites voted in 2012 than in 2008. RealClearPolitics’s Sean Trende, who authored a four-part series on the “missing white voters” of the 2012 election, identified these voters not as traditional Republicans, but as Reagan Democrats: rural, blue-collar, and lower-middle-class people who were likely to have been turned off by Mitt Romney’s wealth and by the Obama campaign’s relentless portrayal of him as an out-of-touch elitist.

Cambridge Analytica’s technology has its skeptics, too. A Republican strategist familiar with the company’s approach describes it as “implausible.” “You can’t do psychoanalysis on millions of people based on what magazines they subscribe to,” he says.

The Cruz campaign’s attempt to harness psychographic information isn’t the Republican party’s first bite at the apple. The Romney campaign undertook a similar effort in 2012, though it was confined to identifying potential donors. The Associated Press chronicled Team Romney’s use of technology developed by Buxton Company, a firm with corporate clients like Restoration Hardware and Marriott Hotels, to target would-be donors. According to the AP, the company combined “marketing data with what is known in this specialized industry as psychographic information about Americans.” It called the Romney campaign’s efforts “the first example of a political campaign using such extensive data analysis.”

The Romney campaign may have raised record sums. Its attempt to translate that money into votes was less successful. The Cruz campaign, with the help of a top donor, is hoping to do better.

— Eliana Johnson is Washington editor for National Review.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; 2016election; campaign; election2016; tedcruz; texas

1 posted on 07/08/2015 4:48:49 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If this worked, it would have forecast how much
Cruz lost by voting for even one part of ObamaTRADE.


2 posted on 07/08/2015 4:50:46 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Can’t wait until this election season begins.

Time for Cruz to crush.


3 posted on 07/08/2015 5:06:17 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
If my memory is correct, Romney's software was turned on Election Day and it barfed. I hope this team beta test the snot out of this and it is not needed that day in November but is a tool used up to that day.

Also, Grass Roots Team-Cruz org's are up and running in various states, smart move IMHO.

Again reaching out to the Big Dollar Donation Crowd 7/10 thru the 12th at the Broadmoor in Colorado Springs:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3308752/posts

4 posted on 07/08/2015 5:18:23 AM PDT by taildragger (It's Cruz & Walker. Anything else is a Yugo with Racing Stripes....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

So what?


5 posted on 07/08/2015 5:40:05 AM PDT by subterfuge (Minneseeota: the laughingstock of the nation - for lots of reasons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Sew buttons.


6 posted on 07/08/2015 5:52:45 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Sow seeds too.


7 posted on 07/08/2015 6:01:05 AM PDT by tenger (Slow down for turtles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
If my memory is correct, Romney's software was turned on Election Day and it barfed.

That was the infamous ORCA program, but it was meant to serve a different purpose - replace poll lists. This is more in line with what Rove did in 2004 and Obama did in 2008 and 2012 - use data analysis to find potential supporters who are not registered, get them registered and then get them to the polls. Smart move by Cruz, he's already learning what works and what doesn't.

8 posted on 07/08/2015 6:38:59 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Oh, I see. Rand Paul guy are you?


9 posted on 07/08/2015 8:54:36 AM PDT by subterfuge (Minneseeota: the laughingstock of the nation - for lots of reasons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

I was a Cruz guy until he voted for ObamaTRADE,
as if you really care.


10 posted on 07/08/2015 9:00:07 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; MountainDad; aposiopetic; ...
    Ted Cruz Ping!

    If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
    Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!

    CRUZ or LOSE!

11 posted on 07/08/2015 10:13:39 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis; subterfuge
I was a Cruz guy until he voted for ObamaTRADE, as if you really care.

Sure you were!
12 posted on 07/08/2015 10:14:52 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Nasty hate like you project, does NOTHING to help Cruz.


13 posted on 07/08/2015 10:21:05 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Nasty hate like you project, does NOTHING to help Cruz.

With the venomous crap you post, not sure how you can take to task anyone else where "hate" is concerned.
14 posted on 07/08/2015 11:29:31 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
You confuse defending the Constitution vigorously
with your unfounded missives against conservative FReepers.


15 posted on 07/08/2015 12:17:17 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
You confuse defending the Constitution vigorously with your unfounded missives against conservative FReepers.

Nawwwww.

I confuse nothing.

Your posts, when they veer off into false labeling and accusations have nothing to do with vigorously defending the constitution.
16 posted on 07/08/2015 12:21:45 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
You're a Johnny one-note, you know that?

Do you think, for once, you could actually post a comment based on the article itself?

#askingforafriend

17 posted on 07/08/2015 7:19:57 PM PDT by PowerPro (Renew - Revive - Restore | Vote Wisely America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PowerPro

The initial comment WAS based on the article.

But then, you knew that.


18 posted on 07/09/2015 5:41:46 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
You do realize your comment was the second one, right? Meaning the first one other than the original posters?

You do also realize that the article is called, "With Mega-Donor’s Technology, Cruz Campaign Promises to Turn Out More GOP Voters than Ever Before" and has zero to say about Obamatrade, right?

So, how then is your incessant nattering about Cruz's initial support for Obamatrade the least bit relevant to the topic at hand?

Answer: It isn't. But then, you knew that.

19 posted on 07/09/2015 5:40:47 PM PDT by PowerPro (Renew - Revive - Restore | Vote Wisely America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson