Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

It just means that they don’t have any protection against copyright or trademark infringement. Anybody can use it for whatever reason they wish.........................


27 posted on 07/08/2015 9:15:51 AM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger; SeekAndFind
-- It just means that they don't have any protection against copyright or trademark infringement. --

Not precisely true. The Redskins still have common law trademark protection, and may have state trademark registrations.

Trademark registration juust greases the skids in favor of plaintiff who has a registration, and I think allows for an increase in damages, use of government agents in border/customs enforcement, etc.

39 posted on 07/08/2015 9:22:52 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger; SeekAndFind

>>> Judge ..... finds name may be disparaging

Since everybody now can use the now-defunc trademark and/or copyright, Redskin is no longer ‘disparaging’?

That judge’s judgment seemed impaired.


43 posted on 07/08/2015 9:27:33 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson