They had better check first to see if the police were the ones who executed their loved one. Oh. That’s right. Anything that might shed light on what really happened is blocked.
Sir, step out of the car please. It appears to me that you have had way too much to think.
“They had better check first to see if the police were the ones who executed their loved one. Oh. That’s right. Anything that might shed light on what really happened is blocked.”
Earlier, the Whacko Cops made a statement that they had shot four of those who died. This isn’t going to end well for Whacko, and the longer they withhold the evidence, the worse it’s going to be for them.
That wouldn't make a difference in this suit. The suit isn't against a shooter, it is against the venue.
Negligence stands when a person act or fails to act in a way a prudent person would, in light of the reasonably foreseeable consequences. The success of this suit depends on a jury finding that the reasonably foreseeable consequence of hosting the event was a shootout.