This isn't a court of law, it's a chat room. People will form their own opinions, and as you know, they don't have to justify them.
-- Those "accused" have the right to know the charges brought against them and to see the testimony against them by their accusers. --
This isn't a court of law. Sheesh, lighten up, Francis. All that's happening is name calling. You may have a list of poster that you find disagreeable, and if so, it's your business. I have a list of posters that I find disagreeable, some of them I tell to their face, others I don't. That's all my business, and the evidence is out in the open, in posts on a public forum. Read the posts, make up your own mind.
I do not have a list of posters. Apparently others do.
I do read the posts and make up my own mind. I do not indulge in the tactic of calling other FReepers “trolls” or any other such disparaging remarks.
As you have said, it is the content of the remarks which makes the difference. Not the number of their posts, or the names they are called -— and sincerely, thank you for that common sense observation.
I would hope that all FReepers agree with you.
There is no need at all, to call other FReepers “trolls” which is disparaging. Then: I am told “lighten up Francis” so what about the troll-callers being told to “lighten up Francis?”
Respectfully, and etc.