[NYer]

H/T to Fedora for the link.

Catholic ping!

[rlmorel]

It is just bureaucratic bs, which is what all UN stuff is (thank goodness)

But it pains me to have the UN appear to be more normal and pro family than the U.S.

[Paulie]

Great, but this condones ‘unprecedented force and reach’ by a global entity like the UN.

It cuts into our sovereignty.

It sets/reinforces a bad precedent.

It’s another step in acceptance to the NWO.

Good, but it could also be a ruse to soften up opposition to a global authority.

[bert]

Outside the family, there are no human rights

A queer with a dyke sister do not a family make

[Mrs. Don-o]

Tremendous! When I get back from Mass I’ll search fo related articles.

[Kolokotronis]

Once one reads the actual resolution, one can see why the Mohammedan countries were its biggest supporters.

BTW, the resolution states that the primary responsibilty for families lies with the State.

This doesn’t contribute to whatever credibilty Life Site News might still have.

[spodefly]

Those opposing the motion included the United States, the United Kingdom, Ireland and other Western European countries ...

The countries committing demographic and cultural suicide would naturally be the one's not to want to piss of the Gaystapo.

[BobL]

Let’s see what page the New York Times puts this on...

[Spok]

Even being right can’t rescue the UN from complete irrelevance.

[tbw2]

Secular progressive values vs. Islamo-fascist.
Interesting to see who wins this, if the Judeo-Christian doesn’t stand up. Probably Muslim, since too many progressives fold when confronted by people who say do what we say or we behead you.

[Grateful2God]

Hi!
I found this article while following up on one of the posts here, and found it interesting, informative, and germane to the subject.

One may be a Christian in America, just don't publicly speak or practice it.

[AllAmericanGirl44]

bkmk