Bush has to more to the left.
The “eerie similarity” does not seem to warrant any red flags at NBC.
2012 - the election results.
What did the percentages look like in 2011?
Wow. You don't see that everyday.... unless you watch NBC.
Look at the source: NBC. Do you trust their numbers? I do not.
The election is November 2016. We still have a long ways to go...and there are many, many Democrats who haven’t been voting. We shall see.
I’d ask you to wake me when the revolution starts...but I’ll hear the reports. I am currently preparing myself for the wrath of the FReepers as they try to shame me into voting for a RINO again. “NaGaDa’t”
Trump beats hillary. Jeb, Christie, Kasich, and the rest of the dwarves don't give independents, new voters, or mildly loyal dems any reason to vote Republican.
uh, okay...
Any amnesty candidate the GOP nominatesis a designated loser.
Let a candidate run who paints Mrs. Clinton as siding with foreigners over citizens and things will look different.
NBC propping up Shrillary’s campaign. Wow, didn’t see this coming.
Riiiiiight!
We will take advice from NBC.
The poll was cooked up a hard left professor one of the radical left wing schools in the US .
American University which is Division of the DNC located in DC .
AU is where the Dem hold all there rallies .
If Trump takes back the Slime House he should closed the place as a danger to the US Constitution.
George W Bush is the and will be the last Republican elected President of The USA
its over L adies and gentleman
Good try NBC. We’re so skeered.
At this stage in the runup to the election, name recognition carries a lot of weight in polling. With her husband having been President for 8 years, and then another decade of fawning press, Hillary Clinton may have more name recognition at this stage than anyone who has ever run for the job.
At this stage before Obama’s first election, he was a relative unknown. Heck he’s still an unknown.
And NBC never, ever, lies.
Of course, NBC is trying to prop up the staggering HRC campaign with a dose of optimism for her here. The major flaws in a comparison between the 2012 vote and the situation now are (1) the GOP candidate has yet to emerge and that Rubio and Walker likely can’t even be identified by the vast majority of a dumbed down general electorate and (2) in so far as all these types of locations (especially big cities) are concerned, Clinton can’t hope to get anywhere near the same black turnout as Obama did in 2012. Furthermore it’s presumptuous to anoint Bush, Rubio, and Walker as the three big GOP contenders at this stage. In sum, these numbers are pretty darn worthless.
Are these the same polls that had Bibi losing 2 months ago?
Pray America is waking
Just another reason to restructure the electoral college to award EVs based on congressional districts with the two senatorial EVs going to the majority winner in that state.
I stopped reading right there. I figured in all probability the next letter would be a 'C'. Was I right? I guess I'll never know...