Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rockrr
The fact that many of them were slave owners is immaterial to their cause or their struggle.

And this is also true of the Southern states efforts to leave. The Difference was at the time the Slave Owning Colonies left the English Union to form their Confederacy, this act was in defiance of British law.

However, they held up the Declaration of Independence as authorized by the Highest law, the law of God and of Nature. Therefore, they ought to subsequently accept the same law as governing future efforts at independence.

The south chose to institute war against it’s fellow states because it perceived a shift in the balance of power represented by the 1860 election.

Your side keeps saying this. Kicking Foreign military people off of your own land without killing any of them is hardly the equivalent of sending 35,000 men into someone's country for the purpose of toppling their government.

The difference is like a slap in the face compared to clubbing someone in the head. Very disproportionate.

107 posted on 07/13/2015 10:07:29 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Your side keeps saying this. Kicking Foreign military people off of your own land without killing any of them is hardly the equivalent of sending 35,000 men into someone's country for the purpose of toppling their government.

And you keep muttering this non sequitur. Sumter was only the opening salvo. Anyone with half a brain knows that. I guess that means you're excused.

108 posted on 07/13/2015 10:10:59 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson