Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FYI
1 posted on 07/14/2015 9:03:14 AM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Isara

Can the next congress make it go away??


2 posted on 07/14/2015 9:09:24 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

where was he when he voted for the Corker bill? Oh yeah, touting some amendment that had no chance so he could cover his posterior with it....


3 posted on 07/14/2015 9:12:01 AM PDT by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

Leaving the mess for the next administration

Cute


5 posted on 07/14/2015 9:15:27 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

In Obama’s twisted Brain this is a done deal and he’ll never talk about Iran again


6 posted on 07/14/2015 9:15:52 AM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

How could he have voted for rhe Corker Bill to abrogate the constitutional 2/3 Senate approval of ANY TREATY!!? What the hell was he thinking?


7 posted on 07/14/2015 9:17:00 AM PDT by WENDLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara
‘Mistake of Historic Proportion’

That would be a great title for the first honest Barack Hussein Obama movie.

9 posted on 07/14/2015 9:19:41 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; MountainDad; aposiopetic; ...
    Ted Cruz Ping!

    If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
    Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!

    CRUZ or LOSE!

11 posted on 07/14/2015 9:27:16 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara
Cruz: We Still Have an Opportunity to Tell the Truth about Today’s ‘Mistake of Historic Proportion’

He Obama! Neville Chamberlain called. He said "Thanks!" "I'm no longer the stupidest appeaser in history! "

12 posted on 07/14/2015 9:31:54 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara
If he gives such a damn about the deal now why in hell did he vote to give Hussein free reign to make that deal without Senat Constitutional 2/3 ratification?

Cruz has shown abominable judgment, at least, on this and on Trade. On the trade deal he partially redeemed himself but the initial action combined with the vote for Iran throws a dense cloud on his loyalty to the Constitution. That from the most articulate and insistent voice for the Constitution in Congress.

14 posted on 07/14/2015 9:40:55 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Ted Cruz: Why I voted YES for Corker Iran bill

May 7, 2015 - U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, released the following statement regarding votes on the Iran Nuclear Review Act:

“This bill was a missed opportunity. If Congress had acted to defend our constitutional authority – if Congress had adopted the Cruz-Toomey amendment – then we would be able to stop a bad Iran deal. Instead, the odds are now overwhelming that under these ground rules President Obama will negotiate, and Congress will acquiesce to, a terrible deal that allows Iran to acquire nuclear weapons and will endanger the lives of millions of Americans and our allies.

I voted no on cloture because we should have insisted on amendments to put real teeth in this bill. Ultimately, I voted yes on final passage because it may delay, slightly, President Obama’s ability to lift the Iran sanctions and it ensures we will have a Congressional debate on the merits of the Iran deal. I will continue to lead the fight to prevent the Islamic Republic of Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and to protect the national security of America and our allies.”

20 posted on 07/14/2015 11:16:22 AM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara
Cruz and the ret of Congress could have stopped this by not passing the Corker Bill.

They had their chance when it would only take 41 votes to STOP it.

Now it takes 67 votes in the Senate and 292 votes in the House to stop it.

21 posted on 07/14/2015 11:17:45 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Sen. Cruz: Congress Must Approve Any Iran Deal

Cruz, Toomey file amendment to give Congress more power over Obama’s Iran deal

April 24, 2015

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pennsylvania, have filed an amendment (#1152) to the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015, which would require affirmative Congressional approval of any Iranian nuclear deal before sanctions relief can occur.

"The Constitution makes clear that Congress must approve international agreements like the one President Obama is negotiating with Iran," said Sen. Cruz. "A nuclear Iran is the single greatest threat to our national security and also poses an unacceptably high risk to Israel. Reviewing this deal and deciding whether or not to consent to it may well be the most important function of this Congress. It is not something that should be rushed, and it is imperative that, at the very least, the President obtain majority support for his deal from both Houses of Congress before moving forward."

As currently written, the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 would first require Congress to pass a resolution of disapproval and then require Congress to muster votes from two-thirds of each chamber to override a Presidential veto. What's more, if Congress failed to act within a set timeframe, the deal would go into effect by default. This process gets the Constitution's allocation of authority precisely backwards.

The Cruz-Toomey amendment would remove these options and restore a more proper process for Congress to exercise its Constitutional power. It would require President Obama to persuade a majority of Senators and Representatives to approve his deal before it goes into effect.

Full text of the amendment can be viewed here.

###

22 posted on 07/14/2015 11:23:18 AM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara
We still have an opportunity to tell the truth about what Prime Minister Netanyahu called today a ‘bad mistake of historic proportion.’

Maybe the time to fight was before you gave him the power to do this. You proclaim the real vote is the cloture vote and you failed on that one.

26 posted on 07/14/2015 11:49:14 AM PDT by itsahoot (55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. RIH-GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson