Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MacNaughton

BSA claims that its new policy protects churches, but all it does is just transfer the risk of lawsuit from the BSA to the church if it doesn’t allow a homoesexual to be a leader. The church will then get sued for discrimination.

Very short-sighted. The churches that didn’t already terminate their relationship with BSA are going to have to do it now.


11 posted on 07/14/2015 1:24:31 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kaehurowing

As I posted on this issue yesterday, this is a huge victory for the queers. It goes a long way toward accomplishing their most cherished goal; unrestricted access to your children and grandchildren.

The BSA, as a large, cohesive umbrella organization, was in the best position to block that access. But this new policy neutralizes them. They will not stand in the way, and they have told the sponsoring organizations “you are on your own.”

The queers are now able to isolate and selectively target the individual sponsoring organizations. These organizations lack the size, resources and sophistication to adequately resist the Alinskyite tactics of isolation, polarization and subjugation. It will suffice to select a few choice sponsors, particually weak and wobbly ones at that, and then go after them with the well-orchestrated queer attack machine. How many times have we seen this played out in the past decade? After a few perfunctory beat-downs, every other organization will either fall in line, or be subjected to the same beat down.

What the BSA did was the same thing Pontius Pilate did when he washed his hands.


30 posted on 07/14/2015 1:45:12 PM PDT by henkster (Where'd my tagline go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson