I agree with you that it’s a slippery slope for libraries to become censors. I’d suggest a serious form of what you stated. Books for children and young adults of a controversial nature should be in a section where parents have to check out the books. It will be overused, for sure, since today almost everything is controversial to someone. But I think we’re at a point where parents should be informed about the indoctrination that’s happening in many children’s books.
> But I think we’re at a point where parents should be informed about the indoctrination that’s happening in many children’s books.
And they are getting sneakier about how they go about seducing children into the lifestyle. Anyone who says that pedopheilia / pederasty aren’t linked to homosexuality is either gay and denying it for obvious reasons or a white guilt liberal sympathizer who doesn’t have a clue.
It's not a "slippery slope," and libraries already are censors.
They don't carry books promoting pedophilia or bestiality, do they?
Why is one perversion preferable to another?