Posted on 07/19/2015 5:48:48 AM PDT by Kaslin
Sometimes the good guys win . . . but only when they stand up to the bad guys. Nowhere is this more true than in politics, especially with the increasingly vicious partisan attempts to criminalize opposition.
On a fall day back in 2012, before dawn, SWAT-styled police with battering rams raided the private homes of a number of Wisconsin families to seize their computers and cell phones and files and more.
The charges?
Well, there were no charges.
This was simply the opening salvo in a long and intrusive “John Doe” investigation of 26 groups suspected of violating Wisconsin’s campaign finance regulations by allegedly coordinating their activities with Gov. Scott Walker’s campaign.
There was no illegal coordination. To this day, after years and much “evidence” gathering, no one has been charged.
Ever have your home raided by the police?
If one were a rapist, a murderer, a terrorist waiting to kill and maim, perhaps an armed police raid wouldn’t shake one up too much. It’s feared but expected, comes with the territory.
But these folks were regular peaceful citizens. People like us. They were being investigated not for violence but for violating a campaign finance reg.
They were terrified.
It raises a scary question: Is America a country where such a thing can happen?
Scary, because the answer is obviously yes.
Certainly, the freedom found in our “Land of the Free” has never been universal or perfect. This requires that we judge this place — and all nations — on the ability of people to right wrongs, to improve their liberty through political action.
Of course, this means citizens must take the trouble to demand their rights — and “a redress of grievances.” They must not stand around like bleating sheep, waiting to be fleeced or slaughtered.
Yet, John Doe probes such as Wisconsin citizens suffered through strip them of the lawful power to fight back. What makes a case a “John Doe” probe is that it comes with a gag order attached: those being investigated are ordered to remain silent. Those who suffered from the Wisconsin raids were told that they couldn’t tell anyone other than their attorneys. They were not legally allowed to spread a word about what was happening without facing additional legal jeopardy.
The operation was totalitarian-thorough: children, forced to miss school waiting while their homes were ransacked, were told to lie to school officials as to why.
Had Eric O’Keefe, head of the Wisconsin Club for Growth, not bravely defied the gag order and spoken out about this sinister and illegal political witch hunt, it might indeed be proceeding apace and in secret — without the people of Wisconsin or America having any knowledge of what their government was doing.
O’Keefe risked talking to the Wall Street Journal, which published an editorial lambasting the Wisconsin speech police. But O’Keefe also sued Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, Special Prosecutor Francis Schmitz and others involved in the John Doe probe in federal court for violating his First Amendment rights.
Federal District Judge Rudolph Randa not only ruled in O’Keefe’s favor, he ordered that all materials taken by DA Chisholm and his speech police be immediately returned and any copies made of documents or computer hard drives be destroyed. Randa seemed incensed by the tyrannical disregard for fundamental rights, writing that the “theory of ‘coordination’ forming the basis of the investigation, including the basis of probable cause for home raids, is not supported under Wisconsin law and, if it were, would violate the United States Constitution.”
Yet, Randa’s preliminary injunction was stayed by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, to allow state court proceedings regarding the investigation to conclude.
The witch hunt continued.
Weeks ago, we learned through discovered emails that Lois Lerner, who has retired with a lavish pension after refusing to testify about her admitted role in the partisan IRS clampdown on conservative and Tea Party groups, is indeed big buddies with the head of the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board, the state’s campaign finance police agency. Though Governor Walker won re-election in 2014, the silencing of 26 groups via judicial gag order and threatened prosecution was undoubtedly a major Democrat success.
This week, finally, the Wisconsin Supreme Court came down with its ruling, emphatically shutting down the John Doe investigation.
“It is utterly clear that the special prosecutor has employed theories of law that do not exist in order to investigate citizens who were wholly innocent of any wrongdoing,” wrote Justice Michael Gableman in the majority opinion. “In other words, the special prosecutor was the instigator of a ‘perfect storm’ of wrongs.”
Strong stuff. But the majority went further, acknowledging the courage and commitment of those who were victimized.
“It is fortunate, indeed, for every other citizen of this great State who is interested in the protection of fundamental liberties that the special prosecutor chose as his targets innocent citizens who had both the will and the means to fight the unlimited resources of an unjust prosecution. Further, these brave individuals played a crucial role in presenting this court with an opportunity to re-endorse its commitment to upholding the fundamental right of each and every citizen to engage in lawful political activity and to do so free from the fear of the tyrannical retribution of arbitrary or capricious governmental prosecution.”
Thank you, Mr. O’Keefe. And thanks to those other Wisconsinites who stood up alongside him. They stood up for their right to be free.
And, accordingly, for ours.
I must have missed the part where the violators went to jail?
Wow.
Unfortunately Walker now has too much baggage for the big prize - despite this attempt by Democrats in Wisconsin to prop him up (to try to stop Trump and Cruz), but Walker is doing a fine job in Wisconsin and teaching the country how to deal with state-level issues. He’ll do just fine there and may be back in 8 years to run for President.
My thought as well. Government has immunized itself from meaningful punishment. Fining government with a goal toward restitution and damages, if it even happened in this case, is useful but the culprits have the taxpayers pickup the cost of their malevolence. In that respect, a Lois Lerner should be imprisoned and stripped of her pension.
This was not righted in any sense of the phrase. The judge, his DAs, and his other political criminals should have been jailed. Two things, call your lawyer no matter what these criminals threaten. Unless they kill you, don’t keep silent. Organized crime in government is to be fought, not ignored.
What a world. A clean guy can be investigated for 5 years, turn over tens ouf thousands of emails. His supporters can be SWATted and their lives ruined. The bogus, fascist investigation can lose in every court and is unable to prove any illegal coordination but the clean candidate comes away with ‘baggage’. Not disagreeing but this is a dangerous way for us to have our politics turn.
The only way to turn back to clean elections reflecting the will of the people is for these investigators to go to prison for their false, unrebuttable attacks.
This is only righted when the abusive prosecutor is wearing prison garments. He knowingly and intentionally violated the civil rights of citizens under the color of authority, so he is no better than the abusive, bigoted and violent lawmen in the South who abused black people exercising their rights.
Things kind of incidences will eventually push it to rope and lamp post for bad gubmit guys.
Why would they go to jail?? They is the gubmint. Like Lois Lerner. Commit crimes, game the system and get big bucks. I can’t tell you how angry that makes me!
THe wrong is not righted until the perps are punished. Jail and stiff fine would be right.
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this wisconsin interest ping list.
“I must have missed the part where the violators went to jail?”
Lots of lawsuits pending. There will be punishment; disbarment at the very least for a lot of the key lawyer-types.
*SPIT*
I believe that this comment reflects a lack of understanding about who plays what role in the legal system. Prosecution of the criminal activity in this case is problematic, since the responsibility for bringing the law breakers to justice are the very same people who are the law breakers. Our courts don't prosecute, they adjudicate, and they must do so in the role that is defined for them.
Civil courts is where this is headed, because the victims can bring a case and they may here find some justice. But that takes time and it takes money, more burdens placed on the victims when the tyrants remain sheltered, at least for the time being. But, this points out that our system has a flaw. What do we do when government commits crime and who makes in right?
We have to address this question, because we now see that not only local governments are prone to corruption and crime, but now both state and Federal governments are increasing operating as an organized criminal activity. At the highest level of government, our President, his Attorney General, and the loyal supporters of the White House are the same ilk as John Chisolm and his henchmen. Our elected representatives are supposed to be want prevent and correct what happened in Wisconsin and are happening at the White House, but they have not.
An honest President would help, but for right now we seem to be searching for yet another celebrity and a candidate with a bag of empty promises. An honest President might only be a complete accident.
“That is a silly statement. What “baggage”?”
Brad Dayspring.
Read about him. Lots more, but I actually still like walker, so I won’t bother repeating it all, unless you demand it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.