Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama looks to ban Social Security recipients from owning guns
FOX News ^ | July 19, 2015

Posted on 07/19/2015 4:48:03 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee

The Obama administration wants to keep people collecting Social Security benefits from owning guns if it is determined they are unable to manage their own affairs, the Los Angeles Times reported.

The push, which could potentially affect millions whose monthly disability payments are handled by others, is intended to bring the Social Security Administration in line with laws that prevent gun sales to felons, drug addicts, immigrants in the United States illegally, and others, according to the paper.

The language of federal gun laws restricts ownership to people who are unable to manage their own affairs due to "marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease” – which could potentially affect a large group within Social Security, the LA Times reported.

If Social Security, which has never taken part in the background check system, uses the same standard as the Department of Veterans Affairs – which is the idea floated – then millions of beneficiaries could be affected, with about 4.2 million adults receiving monthly benefits that are managed by “representative payees.”

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; dva; obama; secondamendment; socialsecurity; tyrant; yesterday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Brad from Tennessee

How does McCain’s calling people “crazy” tie into this?


21 posted on 07/19/2015 5:23:05 PM PDT by Selene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

You cannot deny what is already owned, and already on record, before this year.

The background information check system has to be integrated, and as Obamacare for an example, it will be a while.

You only perform ‘background checks’ when purchasing a firearm. So, I am sure that you will begin to find a lot more ‘one-dollar-transfers-in-private’.

Louisiana has ONLY FEDERAL background checks for sales of firearms, from dealers, only. For any other transactions, the State requires no records kept or retained.


22 posted on 07/19/2015 5:24:01 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbug

Going?


23 posted on 07/19/2015 5:24:41 PM PDT by Lazamataz ("In a very short period of time, these will be the good old days." -- unknown Freeper, 2015)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

Has odungheap asked his security detail to give up their guns yet? How does this POS even find men willing to protect him? They hate America THAT much that they would protect America’s wrecking ball?


24 posted on 07/19/2015 5:27:09 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

They are talking about people on disability who have a representative payee to handle their affairs, not all who are on disability. Still, it’s too broad a brush.


25 posted on 07/19/2015 5:27:28 PM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

Another unposed question is this: what is the mechanism for determining whether or not the human of sub-normal intelligence on disability owns a firearm?


26 posted on 07/19/2015 5:31:34 PM PDT by jimbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I am in favor of this for all the lawyers that have assisted in the fraudulent SS disability claims of recent years. You see their ads on daytime TV 24/7. And take the guns away from the public servants (retired LEO that bleed the taxpayers all that so called disability)


27 posted on 07/19/2015 5:32:05 PM PDT by George from New England (escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Exactly what Stalin did——the State decides who is sane or not. The whole APA was taken over by Marxists in the 70s to destroy Christianity and label Christians “insane”.

Christianity is the only worldview that embraces Individuality and Free Will-—and NOT collective “rights”. Destroy Individualism in children and they will be “group thinkers” and socialists (like the pope). Individuals will be killed and culled and “group think” will be mandatory.

The APA took homosexuality off of the mental disorder list (which it is). It is a learned worldview by childhood trauma and abuse and neglect and now they are forcing our children to “think” sodomizing others is now “Good”.....an irrational, evil, dehumanizing vice which always includes molestation and grooming of boys like with the harem boys of Afghanistan. They need to erase Christian Traditions in our children and instill paganism and satanism to collapse freedom/culture..

Without Virtue (Christian Ethics), there is no Freedom possible.


28 posted on 07/19/2015 5:35:03 PM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Given the current social trajectory it won’t be many years until there is an upper age limit for Social Security Benefits; the government will then house you and feed you but shortly your family will get a letter ....


29 posted on 07/19/2015 5:35:36 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (CA the sanctuary state for stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
The language of federal gun laws restricts ownership to people who are unable to manage their own affairs due to “marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease”

Like EBT card holders!

Many on SS paid for their retirement benefits. They should be left alone to enjoy the freedom they bought and paid for by force.
No so for welfare recipients. THEY have a problem!!

30 posted on 07/19/2015 5:38:05 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

So Obama says it.... Outside of law.

It’s 100% illegal!


31 posted on 07/19/2015 5:41:46 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbug
I don't know if Obama is trying to prod America into violent reaction as a pretext to declare martial law, of if he just simply going insane.

Both.

32 posted on 07/19/2015 5:43:28 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gorush
2 Suggestions:
Get Armed !

Get Trained !

Get Proficient !


33 posted on 07/19/2015 5:59:58 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

check, check and check.


34 posted on 07/19/2015 6:02:37 PM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

laws that prevent gun sales to felons, drug addicts, immigrants in the United States illegally,

Hey, if illegals can get driver’s licenses, and go
to our hospitals and colleges, why can’t they buy
guns......it’s not fair....

When is Obama going to stand up for the illegal
immigrant gun owner?? /s.


35 posted on 07/19/2015 6:06:18 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

“If they can’t manage their affairs”, so if they need a trustee they need to remove their guns.


36 posted on 07/19/2015 6:09:16 PM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbug
I don't know if Obama is trying to prod America into violent reaction as a pretext to declare martial law, of if he just simply going insane.

Can you show me any opposition to all of this? Anyone? Anyone running for president? Anyone in Congress? The sooner people realize that their is only 1 side in this battle the better!

37 posted on 07/19/2015 6:13:08 PM PDT by luv2ndamend (Same party, different letter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

“If they can’t manage their affairs”, 

As if the Federal Government can manage their affairs so well.


38 posted on 07/19/2015 6:16:35 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

Congress right there with him.


39 posted on 07/19/2015 6:26:07 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

The solution is to fix the VA system,not to expand their failures...


40 posted on 07/19/2015 6:33:07 PM PDT by BlueNgold (May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson