Warning you away from liberal shoals since 1996
Click the Pic
Support Free Republic
Posted on 07/20/2015 12:56:42 PM PDT by Kaslin
Last week's successfully concluded Iran agreement is one of the two most important achievements of an otherwise pretty dismal Obama presidency. Along with the ongoing process of normalizing relations with Cuba, this move shows that diplomacy can produce peaceful, positive changes. It also shows that sometimes taking a principled position means facing down overwhelming opposition from all sides and not backing down. The president should be commended for both of these achievements.
The agreement has reduced the chance of a U.S. attack on Iran, which is a great development. But the interventionists will not give up so easily. Already they are organizing media and lobbying efforts to defeat the agreement in Congress. Will they have enough votes to over-ride a presidential veto of their rejection of the deal? It is unlikely, but at this point if the neocons can force the U.S. out of the deal it may not make much difference. Which of our allies, who are now facing the prospect of mutually-beneficial trade with Iran, will be enthusiastic about going back to the days of a trade embargo? Which will support an attack on an Iran that has proven to be an important trading partner and has also proven reasonable in allowing intrusive inspections of its nuclear energy program?
However, what is most important about this agreement is not that U.S. government officials have conducted talks with Iranian government officials. It is that the elimination of sanctions, which are an act of war, will open up opportunities for trade with Iran. Government-to-government relations are one thing, but real diplomacy is people-to-people: business ventures, tourism, and student exchanges.
I was so impressed when travel personality Rick Steves traveled to Iran in 2009 to show that the U.S. media and government demonization of Iranians was a lie, and that travel and human contact can help defeat the warmongers because it humanizes those who are supposed to be dehumanized.
As I write in my new book, "Swords into Plowshares":
Our unwise policy with Iran is a perfect example of what the interventionists have given us-60 years of needless conflict and fear for no justifiable reason. This obsession with Iran is bewildering. If the people knew the truth, they would strongly favor a different way to interact with Iran.
Let's not forget that the Iran crisis started not 31 years ago when the Iran Sanctions Act was signed into law, not 35 years ago when Iranians overthrew the US-installed Shah, but rather 52 years ago when the US CIA overthrew the democratically-elected Iranian leader Mossadegh and put a brutal dictator into power. Our relations with the Iranians are marked by nearly six decades of blowback.
When the Cold War was winding down and the military-industrial complex needed a new enemy to justify enormous military spending, it was decided that Iran should be the latest "threat" to the U.S.. That's when sanctions really picked up steam. But as we know from our own CIA National Intelligence Estimate of 2007, the stories about Iran building a nuclear weapon were all lies. Though those lies continue to be repeated to this day.
It is unfortunate that Iran was forced to give up some of its sovereignty to allow restrictions on a nuclear energy program that was never found to be in violation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. But if the net result is the end of sanctions and at least a temporary reprieve from the constant neocon demands for attack, there is much to cheer in the agreement. Peace and prosperity arise from friendly relations and trade - and especially when governments get out of the way.
Ron and Rand Paul are BOTH Cowards, First Class! “Libertarian” MY A$$!
“Neocons” means what exactly? Supporters of Israel?
At least, they are both willfully ignorant on human nature and religious fervor in international politics.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Awesome! I guess I was wrong all this time. Wait, does Iran imprison Christian pastors? Well, they probably deserve it.
I know Townhall likes the idea that opposing views are presented, but come on!
“Neocons” = “Filthy Jew”. Cowards/Libertarians like the Paul “Boys” specialize in hiding what they REALLY are.
Paul has been banging the drums with policies to create a major international nuclear war... as an almost certitude...
by enabling the appeasement and arming and funding of our enemies...consistently....
he is either an enemy agent, an incredibly stupid and naive ‘peacenik’ person (and he does not otherwise appear stupid), or he’s sold out to our enemies for money.
we can think of no other possibile explanations for his “we are weak, go hide in the corner except fund and arm our enemies with nuclear ICBM’s” enabler advocacy
that he makes some good sense on some other issues is granted, and we believe also unimportant... if America goes down the drain, all those other issues won’t be around (we won’t be around) to discuss
I meant to say that the term “Neocons” to the Coward Democrate and “Libertarians” are equal to the term “Filthy Jew”.
Remember, Kaslin? Remember how we were all going to rue the day we dared criticize Ron Paul, when he was going to be elected President and abolish the UN and the IRS?
Good times.
“Swords into plowshares”, eh. Ron now thinks he’s the Messiah. Bet he’s never read Joel 3:10.
Any thoughts, guys?
God, Paul is such an Ah*le when it comes to American defense
its sickening
(especially since he does make some good sense on several other, far less important issues)
Paul is just sickening, we have no other word for him anymmore
sickening
sickening
barf!
This is why I could never support Rand in the Primaries. I believe he is really much closer to his Dad politically than he lets on. In fact, in private I think the 2 would agree on 95% of policy items. So Rand is stuck trying to pretend he is something he is not.
Don’t get me wrong, I would vote for him in a general election. I am going to vote for any Republican nominee in the general over Hillary, but I don’t trust him one bit.
obama foreign policy = Rand/Ron Paul foreign policy.
As he is also running for his reelection in the Senate, the only way I would for him is his reelection to the Senate, but since I live in TN and not in KY he is plain outta luck
Not according to that arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Otherwise he would have demanded the release of the four American prisoners held by Iran
I’m really starting to believe that deep down, people like Ron Paul don’t ever really want to gain power. They prefer to throw spitballs then go sit in their basements mumbling to themselves about how much smarter they are than everybody else, and how unfairly maligned they are. They enjoy that role. That way they can maintain the fantasy about how right they are about everything. They don’t actually want to achieve power and have their theories tested by reality.
Where is McShame with his rousing chorus of “crazies” and “whacko birds” when you need him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.