Walker: “ On the one hand
on the other hand”
How about more significant questions, press, like what to do about sanctuary cities and the politicians who protect them? How about more on Islamic terrorism at home and abroad? How about questions on closing the border? Taxes? Deficits? Crime? Failing schools? The failures of the welfare state?
Things that really matter?
The Walker family will continue to advocate for gay marriage if they live in the White House. They currently vacation and host parties with the gay couple in whose wedding their son was Best Man. That won’t stop if he’s elected.
Actions speak louder than words.
Great another candidate who likes to waffle on social issues.
Oh Dear. The Daily Beast is dissatisfied with Scott Walkers answers on the subject of homosexual marriage.
On Hillary’s answers pertaining to the tens of thousands of classified e-mails spinning on hard drives in her basement, not so much.
If Walker wants to play it safe, which is about as much as we can ask for from the GOP anymore, whay can’t he just ask the media why they want to be divisive instead of asking about issues of concern to all Americans? That’s not a tough one, even for a politician.
I don’t dislike Scott Walker. I hope that he is more firm on social issues than he seems. But I want someone whom I can trust. His pattern of giving an “uncertain sound” is consistent with those who eventually “evolved” on the subject.
It’s just that when I see him talk, or hear about his record, he’s just so blah. I bet he’s never drank sweet tea.
Jerk.
What’s wrong with: “how the hell would I know?”
He seems unclear on the concept that the federal government isn’t here to fix everybody’s problems, it’s here to protect their liberty so they are free to fix their own problems. That is what America is all about and that is what so many have fought and died for.
Walker seems unclear about how the Constitution limits the feds to a few things like defending our country. Federal acts outside constitutional authority are illegal and by definition acts of tyranny. “Compassionate” federal acts outside constitutional authority are acts of “compassionate tyranny” (what Bush’s “compassionate conservatism” was really all about).
I’m sick of federal tyranny which of course is adversarial to freedom and the protective Rule of Law of the Constitution, but can have a “compassionate” mask.
The rights of a swarm of queers are the same for normal people. They need to put a fecal plug in it and quit whining. Point 2: queers and other perverts vote 99% for the DRATS, so ignore them already.
It’s safe to say LGBT issues are not Scott Walker’s favorite conversation topic.
***
Guess what, sweetheart, it’s also not a big fav with the rest of us. Howzabout you keep your perversions to yourself?