I understand that he is on desk duty, and I further understand that what specific policy he violated was not stated.
When they put you on desk duty for violating policy, aren’t they supposed to tell you what policy you violated?
He knows what policy he violated. He also knows he is going to trying to explain it to a jury soon. This guy is in big trouble thanks to films.
A woman has the right to refuse to get out of her car until she can check with the PD to be sure she is not being accosted by criminals in this Obama world.
He violated the courtesy policy by losing his calm. It is not an indictable offense since it isn’t illegal; just against policy. He will be reprimanded and possibly fired for it, but a jury will not be involved. Just fyi...
“He knows what policy he violated. He also knows he is going to trying to explain it to a jury soon. This guy is in big trouble thanks to films.”
Just as she knows what laws she broke and what lawful order she violated, right?
“A woman has the right to refuse to get out of her car until she can check with the PD to be sure she is not being accosted by criminals in this Obama world.”
He was a uniformed officer, and where exactly is this woman’s right to refuse a lawful order to exit her car enumerated?
I’m sorry, you really don’t seem to have any idea what you are talking about, and you just seem to be rambling about with useless emotions that don’t matter a hill of beans to any facts.