Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Eyes Sales From Nation's Oil Stockpile for Highway Funding
Wall Street Journal ^ | July 22, 2015 | AMY HARDER and NICOLE FRIEDMAN

Posted on 07/23/2015 8:51:32 AM PDT by thackney

Lawmakers are eyeing the Strategic Petroleum Reserve as a piggy bank, but not without controversy.

The Senate is considering legislation that would partly replenish the u.S. highway trust fund with $9 billion worth of sales from the reserve, which at 69S.1 million barrels of oil is close to its 713.S-million-barrel capacity.

This month, the House passed a bill to sell 80 million barrels from the reserve to raise $7 billion to help pay for legislation to boost government drug approvals and research funding.

But proposals to tap the nation's oil stockpile as a way to pay for unrelated government programs have drawn opposition. The Senate Energy Committee chairman, the u.s. energy secretary and oil industry analysts all criticize the move as shortsighted.

The sale of crude from the reserve is one of about IS new funding sources that Senate leaders want to use to offset the cost of a $47.1 billion, multiyear reauthorization of the highway program.

The proposed sale of lOl million barrels from the stockpile, not slated to occur for several years, is expected to raise about $9 billion, making it one ofthe bill's more significant revenue sources.

Other sources include measures to tighten compliance with current tax laws, as well as changes to government fee structures and a smattering of spending cuts. The highway bill was stalled temporarily, but advanced in a procedural vote late Wednesday.

The U.S. government created the reserve after the oil embargo the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries imposed on the u.S. in 1973, which sent global oil prices and u.s. gasoline prices skyrocketing. The reserve's purpose is to safeguard the u.S. against emergency supply disruptions like the OPEC embargo, according to the Energy Department, which manages numerous salt caverns along the Gulf Coast that hold the crude.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; highways; infrastructure; oil; oilreserves; spr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Write your Senators and Representatives.

We should not pay for government spending by selling Strategic Assets.

1 posted on 07/23/2015 8:51:32 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney
The Senate is considering legislation that would partly replenish the u.S. highway trust fund with $9 billion worth of sales from the reserve..

The GOP-e majority must have Highway construction Companies with wealthy Lobbyist.

That is the only thing they understand.

2 posted on 07/23/2015 8:56:12 AM PDT by hadaclueonce (It is not heaven, it is Iowa. Everyone gets a "Corn Check")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Incompetent and corrupt politicians have drained our Nation’s economic and personal assets dry. If they have their way, how long will it be for our Strategic Petroleum Reserve to be on empty?


3 posted on 07/23/2015 8:57:16 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Where is our fuel tax per gallon going? To pay for the Obama vacations?


4 posted on 07/23/2015 8:57:28 AM PDT by Aria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

This really does strike me as impressively stupid.

It is true that gasoline taxes are a drop in the bucket of what it costs to maintain our roads.

Obviously the fairest answer is to raise the gasoline taxes, especially on the heaviest vehicles that do the most damage to the roads.


5 posted on 07/23/2015 8:58:29 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria

Taxing for Highways, Paying for Bike Lanes
http://www.wsj.com/articles/taxing-for-highways-paying-for-bike-lanes-1432591905


6 posted on 07/23/2015 8:58:43 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

They had best ask their bankers in China if it is OK to sell of secured assets.

bonds are secured by the good faith and PROPERTY of the tax payer, all federally owned land and property is property owned by the tax payer and is therefore collateral for China.


7 posted on 07/23/2015 8:59:00 AM PDT by The_Republic_Of_Maine (In an Oligarchy, the serfs don't count.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria

It cost a lot more than fifty dollars a barrel to put it in… what fools


8 posted on 07/23/2015 8:59:03 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aria

the fuel tax is far too low. Does not pay for much.


9 posted on 07/23/2015 8:59:13 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

According to a 2013 analysis by the Heritage Foundation, at least 20% of gas-tax revenues in recent years went toward other programs, from light rail to bike lanes to landscaping projects. Some funds even went toward establishing transportation museums.

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/04/highway-trust-fund-needs-to-be-reprioritized-to-improve-mobility


10 posted on 07/23/2015 9:00:27 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Adjusting for inflation and for oil that was paid in lieu of royalties, the per-barrel cost was $73.77.

Oil is now below $49.

http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3028.html?category=Energy&subcategory=Petroleum


11 posted on 07/23/2015 9:02:04 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
the fuel tax is far too low. Does not pay for much.

It's because we're not getting our money's worth for construction projects.

12 posted on 07/23/2015 9:04:38 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (American Taliban - The Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thackney

If one is to sell assets should sell when the market price is high rather than low. Oil is under $50 right now. Given current market prices for oil and the world situation ... now is a good time to add to the reserves not deplete. These people are really quite stupid.


13 posted on 07/23/2015 9:05:05 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The old buy high and sell low strategy.


14 posted on 07/23/2015 9:05:20 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

that’s probably true, but I don’t see it changing soon. Corrupt construction spending is a bipartisan boon at all levels of government


15 posted on 07/23/2015 9:05:43 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

—yeah —new government economic wisdom— “buy high, sell low—”


16 posted on 07/23/2015 9:06:13 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Just brilliant... sell oil at a price low... and what? Make up the difference in volume or something?

These idiots couldn’t run a lemonade stand.


17 posted on 07/23/2015 9:06:28 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

But those bicycle trails were competitively bid....


18 posted on 07/23/2015 9:07:32 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Oil is what $49 a barrel now. Throw another few hundered million barrels on the market and it will be in the 30s domestically.


19 posted on 07/23/2015 9:08:15 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

I hate to see fuel taxes rise but how stupid is it to have a fixed rate tax instead of a % of the selling price?

Would you rather have a tax that you know will not cover inflation or one that at least has a chance of going up with inflation?

Oh, the problem is the putzes in the government don’t want to have a revenue source that may require variable spending plans... something like the we peons have to manage.


20 posted on 07/23/2015 9:09:30 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson