Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hoosiermama

> “If 0 vetoes it he will be breaking his oath of office of upholding the laws of the USA & set up grounds for impeachment.(possible treason]”

If Obama vetoes Kate’s law (and I hope Trump and Cruz will refer to it as Kate’s law), then I would hope to see especially after today when Ted Cruz showed incredible bravery in a near indictment of Mitch McConnell, I would hope they bring up the word ‘impeachment’ and light a fire in Congress just as they have done these past few weeks.

I think Americans have had it. They are fed up and are not going to take this any longer. The first black or half-black president will go down in history as impeached not because he is black but because he is lawless.

But you know what? I think if Obama saw that this time it was serious, I think he would back down, I really do. Obama would blink.

I’ll share a little anecdote from the latter part of 2013. I have several friends in and around London who were watching the BBC. The biggest news story was Ted Cruz and the House defunding Obamacare. You can imagine how important that was to the Brits. You remember the shutdown, you remember all the protests on the mall, the shutdown of the monuments, the Mall, protestors removing barriers to monuments and so on. Well the Brits were glued to their TV sets watching the BBC report it all. And it looked to them like Ted Cruz and the Republicans were going to win. I was talking to one friend over there and he said “the republicans are winning!”.

Because in the UK it was looking just like Ted Cruz wanted it to look like. He wanted Obama to be seen as a president that would turn down a full budget on everything except for defunding Obamacare. Because the government was indeed fully funded except for Obamacare. Obamacare was the only item that was not funded. So it looked reasonable that there was no danger and no reason ***for Obama*** to refuse the funding because otherwise he would be seen as shutting down the government even though it was fully funded except for his pet program even when it was not up and running.

Then what happened?

Boehner caved. (I think Boehner was blackmailed)

And as happens in history, the victors get to write the history. And Obama’s people wrote the story as Ted Cruz shutting down the government instead of Obama not accepting a fully funded government minus Obamacare.

Obama has never been fully tested on anything accept his failed gun control legislation. And that brings up one more fact related to Kate’s law; the gun used to kill Kate.

The gun used to kill Kate was stolen, was reported stolen from a BLS agent. This highlights the fact that criminals will always find a way to get guns be it that they steal them, have them manufactured or smuggled, criminals will always get guns regardless of laws. Gun control did not and would never prevent Kate from being killed. What would have prevented Kate’s murder is effective border control and no sanctuary cities.


63 posted on 07/24/2015 10:44:53 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage

Kate’s law is a paragraph/sectiin within the entire Trump Bill. Obama cannot veto a part. There is no line veto. The part that would make him eligible for impeachment is in Trumps Law section. It has to do with enforcing the laws (defunding the finances )already on the books that sanctuary cities are choosing to ignore
Kate’s law is the part sentencing criminals for returning after deportation


65 posted on 07/24/2015 10:57:40 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obam5a: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson