[Lakeshark]

I think the NYT has done just enough to force her to confront this issue, nothing more. She's not telegenic, sounds screechy, has huge baggage, they know at this point she's a poor candidate, so they have only placed a shot across her bow.

She now has to show she can overcome her weaknesses, or she can bow out gracefully.

Had this been any of the decent (R) candidates, they would have used their paper to destroy them, clearly they aren't doing that to her. If they were a real paper instead of a leftist broadsheet, they would be doing a lot more negative stuff about her and her Foundation..

[FLCowboy,]

——I think the NYT has done just enough to force her to confront this issue, nothing more. She’s not telegenic, sounds screechy, has huge baggage, they know at this point she’s a poor candidate, so they have only placed a shot across her bow.
She now has to show she can overcome her weaknesses, or she can bow out gracefully.

Had this been any of the decent (R) candidates, they would have used their paper to destroy them, clearly they aren’t doing that to her. If they were a real paper instead of a leftist broadsheet, they would be doing a lot more negative stuff about her and her Foundation.. ——

The NYT still has to protect their liberal base. If this little attack isn’t enough to get Hillary to resign her campaign, then I suspect the White House will find some more ammunition to let loose.

[elhombrelibre]

I’m probably being misunderstood. I don’t mean to imply that they’re appalled by Hillary, or that they’re suddenly civic minded, or that they are conservative. I think they’re out to scoop other news agencies on obvious stories. I think whoever is leaking to them also says that if you don’t write it we’ll give it to the Washington Post. So self interest makes them do their job.