I wouldn’t believe anyone at Obama Inc if they pretended they intended to follow the law.
We all know that’s crap.
Why should they? What will the “opposition party” do if they don’t? Sic the IRS on them?
“So you are not committed to following the law?” Sherman pressed.
“No, I said I am not going to deal with a hypothetical,” Kerry said.
Hanoi John Kerry — is now Jihad John Kerry
Communists do not think that laws apply to them. They are for the nasty, little people populating the “unwashed masses.”
Obama: “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space.”
Medvedev: “Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you ...”
Obama: “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.”
Medvedev: “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”
“This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” That statement tells us much about the president’s mindset.
The specific mention of missile defense is worrisome enough. Mr. Obama has retreated from the missile defense plan that was negotiated with European allies during the George W. Bush administration. Apparently, he is signaling Moscow that he intends to retreat further. The clear implication from the president’s comments is that he cannot tell the American people before the election what he plans to do after the election.
In addition, there is the phrase “on all these issues,” implying more is at stake than just missile defense.”
Article: Obama plans double cross on missile defense
When it comes to keeping America safe, we shouldn’t be too flexible:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/29/obama-plans-double-cross-on-missile-defense/print/
Let’s get real here. At best we are going to get close to a straight party-line vote on this Treaty disguised as an Executive Order. Easily vetoed.
And there is a distinct possibility that the GOPe Leadership (Reid, Pelosi, McConnell and Boehner) might just deliver an Obama victory right from the get-go.
Cruz is right - you can’t trust these guys anymore.
Is it just me or is this either terribly written, excerpted or spoken? I’ve read these two sentences more than twice and still can’t make sense of these lines and most of the other ones.
I guess I’m just stupid or don’t speak Bull Spit.
“The IRGC may publicly oppose this deal because that’s the best thing the Iranian government can do to pursue us to support — here in Congress to support the deal or maybe they genuinely oppose it,” he noted.
Sherman asked Kerry point-blank if “Congress and the United States free, under this agreement, to adopt new sanctions legislation that will remain in force as long as Iran holds our hostages and supports Assad.”
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Progressives = Outlaws, Scoflaws and Lonely Anarchists.
“No, I said I am not going to deal with a hypothetical,” Kerry said. “That’s all.”
Indeed. It is a "hypothetical" whether or not this administration will follow the law.
What does this mean? Is he threatening to loot a wal mart if he doesnt get his way, like the rest of the brothers?
“So you are not committed to following the law?” Sherman pressed.
“No, I said I am not going to deal with a hypothetical,” Kerry said. “That’s all.”
Just like Obama, and most of the rest of the politicians of the Washington cartel today Kerry’s swearing his allegiance to protect the constitution, etc. was a blatant lie.
The only way to get our country back is to enforce the laws, the oaths of office, and make them pay the penalties for not abiding by the laws, or their oaths to protect them. Congress should be the first to be wiped clean.
