Posted on 07/30/2015 7:09:18 AM PDT by pgkdan
For years, Republican candidates have been assured by their political consultants that amnesty is a runaway hit with the public. Then they always come in for a zinger of a surprise when the American people are finally able to express themselves on the subject. (Sometimes it seems as if political consultants are in the game only to make money.)
Washington has tried to sneak through three amnesties in the last decade — in 2006, 2007 and 2013. Each time, amnesty had the full support of the media, the White House, leaders of both political parties, big campaign donors and lobbyists.
And every time, as soon as the public got wind of what was happening, the politicians scattered like roaches and the loudest amnesty proponent in the room would suddenly be demanding “border security first!”
Couldn’t Republicans spare themselves the embarrassment of having to say they “learned their lesson” by learning the same lesson of the last 17 guys to push amnesty?
The McCain-Kennedy amnesty passed the Senate in 2006, instantly inspiring an outpouring of voter anger so virulent that it shut down the congressional switchboards. Despite enormous opposition from voters, lame-duck President Bush cockily told reporters, “I’ll see you at the bill signing” — the first step to ushering in a Democratic Congress in the upcoming midterm elections.
By contrast, House Majority Leader John Boehner told a group of Republicans that he had “promised the president today that I wouldn’t say anything bad about this piece of sh-t bill.”
Weeks later, the chief sponsor of the POS bill, Sen. John McCain, voted for a fence with no hint of amnesty.
A year later, when he was running for president, immigration was the issue dominating the primaries. McCain told voters, “My friends, I learned a lesson.” What he had allegedly learned was: “We must secure the border first. We need to do these other things, but the American people want something done about the border.”
McCain even cut macho campaign commercials of him walking by the southern border, saying, “Build the dang fence!”
Too little, too late. McCain lost the dang election.
Bush’s loss was equally monumental: He lost Congress by pushing amnesty.
Contrary to liberals' claim that they had finally won the hearts and minds of the people in opposing the Iraq War, leading to the Democrats' 2006 sweep of Congress, a Washington Post/ABC News poll taken about a month into Bush’s incessant yammering about amnesty showed that more Americans approved of Bush’s handling of the Iraq War than approved of his handling of immigration.
In nearly every poll on Bush’s handling of immigration that year, about 60 percent of the public disapproved and only 25 percent approved.
After Bush’s party was wiped out in the midterm elections, the Democratic-controlled Congress seemed certain to pass amnesty. Bush still wanted it. So did the Democrats. So did the media. So did the donors.
But there was one teensy problem: The public still hated the idea.
You know how people always say “you can’t beat something with nothing.” When it comes to amnesty, “nothing” outpolls “something” every time.
In early June of 2007, a Rasmussen poll found that support for “no bill” beat support for the Senate immigration bill by 5-to-3. By the end of the week, “no bill” was winning 2-to-1, with 53 percent against amnesty and only 26 percent for it.
Public opposition was so vociferous, the Senate didn’t even vote on the 2007 amnesty.
Then, a few years later, erstwhile tea party darling Sen. Marco Rubio burst on the scene deciding he was going to be the one to enact amnesty! Teaming up with everybody’s favorite senator, Chuck Schumer, Rubio spent a full year zealously pushing amnesty, which entailed his telling huge, whopping lies about it.
He blanketed the airwaves, convinced Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin to support the bill, toured all the Sunday morning talk shows. It worked! The Senate passed Rubio’s amnesty bill. It was Rubio’s only accomplishment in Washington.
But then, unfortunately for him, the public found out about it and, once again, an amnesty bill died. (When will these so-called “voters” stop with their infernal meddling?)
The next thing we knew, Rubio was swearing to attendees at the March 2014 Conservative Political Action Conference that what “I’ve learned is you can’t even have a conversation” about “immigration reform” until “future illegal immigration will be controlled,” calling it “the single biggest lesson of the last two years.”
A few months later, he told The Wall Street Journal that he wouldn’t vote for his own bill if it came up again.
One-time GOP star, New Jersey governor Chris Christie, was suckered into supporting the Schumer-Rubio amnesty by a mere 20-minute conversation with Schumer. Not content to support the intensely hated amnesty bill, Christie also signed a bill granting illegal aliens in-state tuition.
But just before announcing his run for the presidency this year, Christie claimed that he, too, had “learned” more about the issue. He now claims he considers a path to citizenship “extreme” and accused Hillary Clinton of “pandering” by supporting a path to citizenship.
I’d say Christie had to eat his own words on immigration, but that would be a cheap shot.
As governor of Arkansas, Mike Huckabee denounced a bill to require verification of citizenship before registering to vote or applying for public benefits, saying it “inflames those who are racist and bigots.” (Voters LOVE being called bigots!)
He made the weird claim that companies like Toyota or Nestle might refuse to invest in Arkansas if the bill became law, by sending the message that, “If you don’t look like us, talk like us and speak like us, we don’t want you.” It might also send the message that we don’t want foreigners voting in our elections or collecting public services meant for Americans.
But whenever he runs for president, Huckabee becomes a born-again Minuteman! His current presidential website denounces “the Washington establishment” for trying to “reward illegal immigrants with amnesty and citizenship,” adding, “Without a secure border, nothing matters.”
Instead of having to keep apologizing for their positions on immigration, maybe Republicans should stop listening to political consultants who are paid by business lobbyists to dump millions of poverty-stricken, low-wage workers on the country.
Out of nowhere, non-politician Donald Trump has shot to the top of the polls by denouncing America’s widely unpopular immigration policies. All those high-priced campaign consultants are standing around scratching their heads.
Americans can see they’re being forced to subsidize people who are being brought in only to outvote them, provide cheap labor and change our culture. All the donor money in the world isn’t going to help you, Republicans, if the voters hate you.
This was my first step away from Bush. I completely dumped him on election night 2006. After the GOP got it's clock cleaned and lost the House, he sends Tony Snow out to congratulate the democrats and announced, that with the new democrat controlled House he would have a partner to pass Comprehensive Immigration Reform. When I heard that I damned near shot the TV! From that point on Bush was dead to me.
“This country was made by immigrants”. Yeah but those types of immigrants don’t exist anymore.
Excellent read. All the GOP candidates should tack it to the wall next to their bathroom mirror.
“Out of nowhere, non-politician Donald Trump has shot to the top of the polls by denouncing America’s widely unpopular immigration policies. All those high-priced campaign consultants are standing around scratching their heads.”
I love how Trump is baffling the MSM and the politicians. He might not win, but he’s definitely making some very powerful people very uncomfortable...at last.
It’s a scam, businesses are willing to give them millions of dollars to try to push amnesty, and those businesses keep giving them money even if they never get it passed, just so long as they at least obstruct enforcement. That’s what the businesses really want, not amnesty. Amnesty would mean that the businesses would have to start paying minimum wage, social security, insurance, etc. They would rather have this gridlock where nothing gets done and illegals keep streaming across the border.
When Trump reminds us that Bush was a lousy president, this is part of what he means. Disgusting.
They exist-the white South Africans-but the US and other western nations are making it very difficult for them to emigrate here. Unlike the masses of parasitic, murderous, diseased illegals they allow to just walk in (Mexicans and South Americans), or pay leftist churches to bring here to dump on the public teat at our expense (Haitians, Somalis, assorted Muslims, etc).
They don’t learn anything, other than to start lying through their teeth. They’ll keep trying once in (or back in) office.
Campaign Huckabee is a world away from executive Huckabee.
The media and democrats put non-whites and immigrants into a plantation and use racial warfare as other marxists used class warfare to install socialism (”Republicans are racist”).
And say what you will about Republicans as you freepers lecture me the states run by Republicans are doing better as in Texas vs California and the Red states vs the Blue states. If we don't see the problem as coulter states it and we don't fight then we're done. this bs about the parties being the same just helps democrats and what they are doing with racial politics (racial marxism I call it).
Yeah maybe at the national level the Congress, boner et al are horrible but look the states .
This is the only chance we have to fight the democrat/media/immigrant complex. to not see this as the source of all problems is our error. We freeepers and Americans do see the problem illegals . yes but also immigrants are the problem and the democrat party and media using immigrants to install socialism on us . this is why the country keeps moving towards the left the media and the immigrants. If there weren't the 80 million non-white 3rd world immigrants imported since ted kennedy’s and the democrats 1965 immigration act the country wouldn't be so far to the left now.
Ann’s right on this issue... her voice is important.
Very good article. Ann catches a lot of flak from Conservatives and rightfully so, but when it comes to the issue of immigration, illegal aliens and amnesty, she is an irresistable force. I have a lot of respect for her and Michelle Malkin on this issue.
Oh they exist! They're just not allowed to come here...they don't fit the plan. There are 10's of thousands of Christians in the middle east who would give their left kidney to come here...but none of them will be able to. They're muslim neighbors are practically recruited to immigrate though.
Couldn’t agree more.
Ann's got her warts but on immigration she's spot on!
Bush could have shut down illegal crossings from the Mexican border on 9/12/2001 and he would have had 100% support of the American people .....that would have saved more US lives than any of the wars in the middle east have
This country was made by immigrants when there was a frontier that needed populating and industries crying out for unskilled and semi-skilled labor.
These are now things of the past. While I am all for draining the brains of other nations, we otherwise do not need immigrants and we definitely do not need illegal aliens.
You have a point. The other problem I see is the ratio of the bad types to good types seems to be about 100:1.
She’s one of the first to see the problem... she’s a blessing...
We are not into “illegal” immigrants.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.