Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: T-Bird45

Based on your comments, I’m guessing the BSA now assumes that the protections in place must be so good that the last protection, NOT allowing homosexual scout leaders, is no longer a necessity. That might be a false assumption, but they have done it now, and the world has to react. On it’s face it appears to be the stupidest move the organization could have taken under the circumstances. Just what part of the under two percent of the population are they trying to appease, and why?


13 posted on 07/31/2015 4:03:18 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: wita

The percent supporting “rights” is WAY MORE THAN TWO PERCENT. Then there’s the major corporate sponsors or people willing to buy fundraiser items, and it’s not a small number either way.


26 posted on 07/31/2015 5:37:47 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: wita

I think you’ve arrived at about the only conclusion that can be drawn and I’ll say it’s definitely a false assumption because basic human nature says otherwise. Good comment on the 2%, too.


28 posted on 07/31/2015 5:45:44 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson