|
 |
Posted on 07/31/2015 9:32:02 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
Mitt Romney is in love with Ted Cruz. So is Jeb Bush. They both must be, or else why would they care enough to offer advice to Ted Cruz in his campaign to become President?
Appearing on the Chad Hasty Show on radio station KFYO in Lubbock, Texas, Cruz condemned both Romney and Bush “[for] talking about ‘now take it easy guys you don’t really need to oppose this Iranian nuclear deal quite so forcefully.’”
According to Cruz, both are members of the Washington foreign policy establishment and are unwilling to oppose the deal with sufficient vigor.
Earlier this week, Cruz told a roundtable that “if this [Iran nuclear] deal is consummated, it will make the Obama administration the world’s leading financier of radical Islamic terrorism,” referring to the sanctions relief provided in the deal in exchange for curbs on the Iranian nuclear program.
Hasty asked Cruz about a tweet written by Romney in response to the Texas senator’s comments, saying Cruz “is way over the line on the Obama terrorism charge,” and that his rhetoric “[h]urts the cause.”
Cruz said Romney hurt his chances in the 2012 presidential election by making the same mistake as Bush: toning down his attacks on Obama. Cruz pointed to a moment during a presidential debate when Obama insisted that he had called the 2012 Benghazi attack terrorism immediately, even though many conservatives believe he was slow to identify the attack as an act of terror.
When Obama fired back at Romney in the debate, in Cruz’s retelling, the former Massachusetts governor responded, “I’ll just kind of rearrange the pencil on the podium here,” rather than engaging vigorously with the president.
So what is this really about? Obviously neither Romney nor Bush care about Ted Cruz. They are worried that he is damaging the Republican brand.
The kettle is calling the pot black! How ironic is that?
Romney and Bush have the same view of the American political electorate; there are conservatives, who are presumed to be loyal voters and don't need to be catered to; there are liberals, who support the Democrats, and then there is the vast, moderate middle, and this is the group Republicans must appeal to. In Romney and Bush's view, this mushy middle is turned off by direct attacks on Democrats. They believe such attacks don't look "grownup" and that the tone turns off people.
That's the strategy Romney employed in 2012, and he used it to great success to win nearly 2/3 of the electoral votes that Barack Obama did. He wants to share the secret of that success with Ted Cruz. Instead of being embarrassed, and hiding in a corner somewhere for losing what should have been an easy victory over an imperial president presiding over a disastrous economy, Romney is the senior sage dispensing advice and hemlock in equal amounts.
But Ted Cruz doesn't believe in that. He thinks an election is won by drawing clear contrasts. He believes that so-called moderates aren't looking for a soft-spoken candidate who is just a bit less Democratic than the Democrats; even moderates are looking for a candidate with a strong vision to believe in.The only difference is that conservatives alread believe in the vision; moderates could believe in the vision, if they were presented a compelling argument for it. That's where Romney failed (without understanding why, evidently) and where Ted Cruz and people like him are trying to succeed.
(Abridged version originally published in AT)
|
|
Ted Cruz Ping! John Ellis Bush Bush?
Updated FR Excerpt and Link Only or Deny Posting List due to Copyright Complaints
Additionally, this is a blog article and doesn't belong in News/Activism.
Ted should have fired back that he wasn’t surprised at all by their responses since they’re both Jew haters and racists. It’s probably not true and I know he’s too much of a gentleman to stoop that low but, hey, it would be nice to see a few sparks fly as we head into the weekend!
Outside of the Orca debacle over GOTV.
Cruz is dead on regarding how Romney lost the election.
Good work, SCP. You got that corrected quickly. If only all Freepers were as diligent in protecting Free Republic.
FReep On, FRiend!!! 8^)
Romney and Bush are both part and parcel of the “establishment.” They don’t want anyone making waves or upsetting the apple cart. (Just let us go on making our deals and engaging in our crony capitalism thing, and the rest of you shut the f** up.). When it comes down to the crunch, they would rather have someone in power who could be bought off, like Hillary, than a Ted Cruz or Donald Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.