Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gamecock

“isn’t this a State issue”

It is, but....the article says poor downtrodden immigrants may be inconvenienced as the reason for getting rid of licenses.

I’m a professional engineer. I have to get licensed in each state. It’s unnecessary and impedes commerce. Most states engineering boards do very little but collect fees.

I’m happy to demonstrate competence, but why do I have to do it in every state?

Unnecessary licensing will eventually be ignored. Immigrants have nothing to lose. Why bother getting licensed if there is no penalty for you? There is for me though....


18 posted on 07/31/2015 12:50:38 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: RFEngineer

I too am a professional engineer and I think if one is tested and granted a license in a state that should suffice. Granted I’m only familiar with the NW, but California (seismic) and Alaska (artic engineering) have requirements that some may not have competency in. Although California’s requirement for Civil Engineers to take a 4 hour survey test is absurd since I will rely on land surveyors to provide the data I need.


20 posted on 07/31/2015 12:58:09 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson