Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton turns himself in on felony charges
KPRC-TV ^ | 8/3/15 | Phil Archer

Posted on 08/03/2015 9:57:33 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton turned himself in Monday morning at the Collin County Jail in McKinney to be booked on three felony charges.

Paxton posted a total of $35,000 bond on two counts of securities fraud and one count of failing to register as an investment adviser.

Sources said a grand jury in Collin County handed up the indictments Tuesday, which were immediately sealed. The charges stem from an investigation carried out by the Texas Rangers.

The first two are first-degree felonies punishable by up to 99 years in prison on conviction. The last is a third-degree felony that carries a punishment range of up to 10 years in prison.

(Excerpt) Read more at m.click2houston.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; collincounty; court; election2016; kenpaxton; law; mckinney; servergy; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: RitaOK

I don’t know the Ranger’s history enough to know if bad applies show up from time to time.

It does concern me that a person might break some security laws out of ignorance.

It’s not really fair for me to address it in factual terms, because I don’t know the situation. I just like to see people tried on things they purposefully did wrong.

I wonder if this is related to someone who lost a lot of money and is trying to recoup some of it.


41 posted on 08/03/2015 11:01:08 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Moving day: June 16th, 2015. LEFT >>>HOPE and CHANGE>>> RIGHT / [DOPE and STRANGE stay home].)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Marcella
-- Except for Governor Abbott. I think if he believes Paxton is compromised and it would be bad for Texas for him to remain in office, he will ask him to resign. --

Yeah, that's a political decision/question. Paxton is better off fighting this, but the governor may not want that action cluttering up the Texas landscape.

This is a good opportunity to hand out some "unpopular" decisions from the AG's office, since the scapegoat is identified.

42 posted on 08/03/2015 11:01:45 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
-- I plead ignorance of the investment world, but isn't it NORMAL to make a commission as an investment advisor? --

Yes, but they disclose that, it's baked into the transaction cost, etc. In this case, the "commission" was unknown to the ones paying. I picture the transaction being "investors paid into Severgy, Severgy kicked-back some of that to Paxton for the referral."

The seriousness of that infraction (aside from the arbitrary assignment of seriousness that the law assigns) really depends on the players and what they know about each other, their past history in investments, and lots of other factors.

43 posted on 08/03/2015 11:07:15 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

My initial thoughts too.

Esp seeing pics of brainwashed Dems “protesting” against Paxton at the courthouse

The Dems have a near monopoly on corruption. Yet nary a peep from the MSM


44 posted on 08/03/2015 11:08:59 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (De-fund ALL "Sanctuary Cities" And remove the idiots in charge of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

Yeah, it doesn’t look good based on what I’ve read also. Fees paid to unlicensed “advisor” tracing bank records, customer complaints, etc. should be easily tied together if that’s the case. There were also complaints that Mowery tried to get clients to sign backdated documents that Paxton would receive a percentage of advisory fees.

It may be a vendetta but these events occurred and were being investigated before last month when Paxton made the marriage license statements.

The penalties seem very harsh, but I suspect he’s in alot of hot water over this. There might have been a conflict of interest with him being an estate planner lawyer and not being able to secure the proper investment licenses in Texas so he didn’t register. For him to allegedly do this IMO was really stupid and out of character for him. Very disappointed.


45 posted on 08/03/2015 11:15:58 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (De-fund ALL "Sanctuary Cities" And remove the idiots in charge of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

So true.


46 posted on 08/03/2015 11:21:47 AM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Sorry for the existence of bad English in that post.

Ouch.


47 posted on 08/03/2015 11:26:18 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Moving day: June 16th, 2015. LEFT >>>HOPE and CHANGE>>> RIGHT / [DOPE and STRANGE stay home].)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Totally missed it. My own astigmatism must have its advantages, after all! LOL! Your English is quite okay in my book. :)


48 posted on 08/03/2015 11:29:01 AM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Thanks RitaOK.


49 posted on 08/03/2015 11:30:38 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Moving day: June 16th, 2015. LEFT >>>HOPE and CHANGE>>> RIGHT / [DOPE and STRANGE stay home].)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

A maximum sentence doesn’t mean he’ll get one if guilty. Someone who makes millions off of deceiving hundreds of investors would be more likely to get the maximum sentence. But if he made $100K by fraud, then he deserves some prison time. That isn’t exactly a gray area of the law...


50 posted on 08/03/2015 11:40:12 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Can you remember what America was like in 2004?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Fair amount of shared ignorance downthread.

First, the county where he was indicted is heavily Republican, and a TEA party stronghold.

Second, this didn’t crop up after he took office. He admitted the facts surrounding the investment adviser charge before the election. (The fraud charges are new). So the indictment on that count shouldn’t be unexpected.

I have no opinion as to his guilt on any of the charges, but no one should express surprise as to the current circumstances.


51 posted on 08/03/2015 5:31:49 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Perhaps the $1000 fine was for something that took place after the incident these charges are related to. Perhaps he had already extricated himself, but was found to be in violation for something he did earlier.

The fine was a civil penalty (with a lower burden of proof) not criminal. So same facts, but not a double jeopardy situation.

52 posted on 08/03/2015 5:37:40 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Thanks Par35. I appreciate the explanation.


53 posted on 08/03/2015 5:42:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Moving day: June 16th, 2015. LEFT >>>HOPE and CHANGE>>> RIGHT / [DOPE and STRANGE stay home].)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat
The Dems have a near monopoly on corruption.

Not in Collin county. There was the case of the former DA who prosecuted cases tried before his mistress. The judge who was convicted of felony bribery (and got probation). The Clerk who misused her office for campaigning. A first assistant district attorney was indicted for for record tampering (don't remember how that turned out - I don't think it made it to trial).

And it is all republican on republican action.

54 posted on 08/03/2015 5:53:21 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

“Yeah, it doesn’t look good based on what I’ve read also. Fees paid to unlicensed “advisor” tracing bank records, customer complaints, etc. should be easily tied together if that’s the case. There were also complaints that Mowery tried to get clients to sign backdated documents that Paxton would receive a percentage of advisory fees.”

I really want this to be a political persecution we can dismiss, but if what you say is true he’s toast, and richly deserves to be.

This is outright fraud, and he should do time. If proven.


55 posted on 08/04/2015 12:59:07 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson