I think there’s a crucial difference between these two concepts.
The children of taxpayers are qualified to attend these schools and have access to their athletic programs. If they wish to opt in, they should be able to, participating in the school education process or not.
The owners of stock are never qualified to get top executive salaries or benefits. I don’t believe there is any supporting reason for them to be able to opt in.
We’re talking two different types of situations here. I don’t see a way to compare them favorably.
I think it was a fun suggestion, but I don’t see more than that in it.
I simply meant that you get the benefit of your stock rising in value. You also get the opposite if it tanks. Of course you don’t get the bennies the CEO gets. You don’t get the ones the school superintendent gets, either.
Well said.