Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

I said he DIDN’T want to get rid of them. At least that is what i meant.

You are going round and round on something that is imaginary. Huckabee did not say we should get rid of B52s. He said we are not investing in the military but rather we are cutting it back during a very dangerous time in the world.

As a matter of principle the military should be constantly seeking to make better and better and better planes, bombs, guns, soldiers, etc.... There should never even be a pause.


45 posted on 08/07/2015 1:49:46 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Gotta love old Mike, he said there were 44 when there are 70+-. He also complained about how old they were. No doubt they are old but he just focused in on a solution where there wasn’t a problem. Like I said the F-35 is ripe for attack.

Sort of like the A-10, it’s still the best tool for the job.

Sort of like the focus on Sanctuary Cities. Why are there Sanctuary Cities? Because there is no border control. Nobody brought that cause and effect up and it is crucial to the debate.

The format also was an issue, but when you only get 10 minutes you have to be careful about what you say and not leave people like me thinking you don’t know what you are talking about and Mike left me thinking that.


46 posted on 08/07/2015 1:59:16 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson