Posted on 08/07/2015 7:06:53 PM PDT by Buttons12
Another fix is in.
They are going to have to build a large addition to a Federal prison to contain all of the players in Hillary Clinton’s and Lois Lerner’s scandals.
Only if you are a Republican.
I believe it is a crime for her to have the emails at this time. All material was to be turned over to STATE upon her exit. Just the fact she still has same is a crime. Secondly, she has the information available to her while she is an employee of the Clinton Foundation. Another crime.
Clinton Foundation is the crime of the century. Clintons write off donations to themselves and then pocket the money. Nothing goes to charity. Fraud was committed when the Clinton Foundation purchased this home server for Hillary. It was written off as an expense yet retained exclusively for the Clintons.
Leni
THIS JUST IN U.S. intelligence officials are scrambling to contain damage from potentially hundreds of spy agency secrets in Hillary’s private emails...as questions mount over why DOJ has not yet opened a criminal investigation WRT mishandling mountains of classified information....actions far more egregious than ex-CIA Director David Petraeus.....who was prosecuted, and sentenced to two years probation, and a $100,000 fine.
================================================
Let's ask the NY TIMES about criminal implications of Hillary's emails.
Did the NYT report to its readers that a high government official (particularly the Secy of State) to utilize day to day a non-government computer for communications in the performance of their job is in violation of security laws in dozens of ways?
Did the NYT factor in that emails emanating from Hillary's private server contained classified ntl security data?
Did the NYT bother to determine that the US govt tech system is really fussy----particularly about emails from the US State Dept?
Did the NYT determine that a govt official (particularly the Secy of State) cannot simply buy a brand new computer with licenses and programs and expect to have it certified?
Did the NYT report that US govt officials are required to have a government-purchased computer, set up by the govt, utilizing a CACC card cleared technician?
Did the NYT advise readers that even the calendar of the Secy of State is considered classified information?
Last but not least---would the NYT have been this accommodating if the subject of a story was a Republican?
=============================================
Contact The New York Times
620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018
Tel: (212) 556-7777
Fax: (212) 556-7088 or (212) 556-5830
EMAIL FORM PAGE
https://myaccount.nytimes.com/membercenter/help.html
===============================================
NY TIMES PUBLISHED CLARIFICATION (REPRINT): The Times reported online Thursday night (and in some print editions Friday) that the State Department IG ---and US intelligence agencies had sent a referral to the Justice Department requesting a “criminal investigation” into whether Mrs. Clinton “mishandled sensitive government information” on the email account. That article was based on multiple high-level government sources.
Shortly after the article was published online, however, aides to Mrs. Clinton contacted one reporter to dispute the account. After consultation between editors and reporters, the first paragraph was edited to say the investigation was requested “into whether sensitive government information was mishandled,” rather than into whether Mrs. Clinton herself mishandled information. That type of substantive change should have been noted immediately for readers; instead, a correction was not appended to the article until hours later.
On Friday, another question arose — whether the investigation being sought was a “criminal” inquiry. As other news organizations followed up on The Times’s report, the Justice Department confirmed to them that a “criminal” investigation had been requested. Officials also gave that description again to Times reporters who were rechecking their initial story. But later in the day, the Justice Department and the inspectors general said that the request was not a “criminal referral” but rather a “security referral,” meant to alert the F.B.I. about a potential mishandling of classified information. It was not clear how the discrepancy arose.
NOTE The crimes by a federal govt employee could have been more extensive.....including forgery..... if the govt employee signed someone else's name on the timesheets.
It is also a crime TO FILE falsified govt documents.
AND THESE:
18 U.S.C.§1001, Presenting a False Document to an Agent of the US Government (involves several felonies and could include forgery);
If he falsified timesheets, there's the possibility of violating 18 U.S.C.§1027---making false statements and concealment of facts in relation to documents required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
Other possible offenses include civil and/or criminal RICO violations.
Possibly full investigations crentering on RICO conspiracies under 18 U.S.C. §1962(c) could be warranted because (1) the persons (2) were employed by or associated with an enterprise (3) that engaged in or affected interstate commerce and that (4) the persons operated or managed the enterprise (5) through a "pattern" (6) of racketeering activity, and (7) the taxpayers were injured by reason of the "pattern" of racketeering activity.
All of these apply to Cheryl Mills, as well.
=======================================
Sen. Charles E.Grassley (R-Iowa) inquiry's WRT possible “criminal” conduct by Hilary aide Huma Abedin got a response from State Department investigators who concluded Abedin was overpaid by nearly $33,000 because she violated US govt rules governing vacation and sick leave.
Sen Grassley needs to determine whether:
<><> (1) Cheryl Mills is still on the State Dept payroll collecting govt checks (an old bureaucratic trick), and,
<><> (2) whether Cheryl Mills violated 18 U.S.C.§1027; Cheryl Mills might have made false statements and colluded to conceal activities in relation to documents required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
It is also possible that Cheryl Mills's collusion w/ Hillary, and other hidden offenses could include civil and/or criminal RICO violations. Cheryl Mills's connections to the Clinton Foundation could also involve BUT not be limited to:
<><> Title 18 U.S.C. §1341, Mail Fraud, 18 U.S.C.§1001, Presenting a False Document to an Agent of the US Government (involves several felonies and could include forgery;
Possibly infractions centering on RICO conspiracies under 18 U.S.C. §1962(c); investigations could be warranted because (1) the persons (2) were employed by or associated with an enterprise (3) that engaged in or affected interstate and international commerce and that (4) the persons operated or managed the enterprise (5) through a "pattern" (6) of racketeering activity, and (7) the taxpayers were injured by reason of the "pattern" of racketeering activity.
Alleged Offenses could include Violation of Title 18 U.S.C. §241 – Conspiracy Against Constitutional Rights – which prohibits in relevant part, “two or more persons (from conspiring) to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same . . .” See, 18 U.S.C. §241.
Mills should be in prison where she belongs.
Are you assuming they care?
==============================================
Oh look, everybody .....lock-stepping Clinton factotums---just following orders. One hand in somebody's pocket, one hand in the cover-up; one foot in govt, one foot in the Clinton camp.
======================================================
Mills tells a judge her lawyer advised her to "delete" State Dept emails currently in her possession.
BTW, do these lawyers (Mills is one) know that the judge has discretionary powers---including disbarment and jail-time ---for violations of court orders?
Way back in the dark days of the Clinton rule of terror, this evil creature had Vince Foster’s papers in her apartment after his untimely death. She knows where a lot of the Clintons’ skeletons are buried. She absolutely is overdue for prosecution.
Prosecute this women ans Hillary for beaking the Law.
You might be thinking of Hillary Clinton's chief of staff Margaret Williams. She did that.
That is obstruction of justice and tampering with evidence. The attorney will be jailed and dis barred in my opinion along with Mills. This has gone into blatant criminal conspiracy.
Playing with fire. There’s a prison cell with her name on it.
Do they mention her BO, halitosis, and bitchy temperament?
Why isn’t the FBI breaking down the doors right now?
Has Hillary and Mills already obtained a pardon from Pookey and so feel they can act with impunity?
You’re probably right - Williams held the same kind of high level advisor position with Hillary that Mills does now and was also black I think - but I’m thinking maybe she took off somewhere far away when things got too hot in DC - it’s sort of coming back now - thanks....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.