[Mygirlsmom]

So Trump defenders say "he's evolved" ,but she's to be avoided because of past liberal positions.

I'm a fan of neither, but I want to understand the "rules" here.

[spacejunkie2001]

the diff to me is, he’s outloud and proud, with his stances whereas she’s sneaky and attempting to deceive us into believing she’s something she’s not.

With that said, Cruz is my guy and the only one that hasn’t flipped on all the positions.

[Talisker]

So Trump defenders say "he's evolved" ,but she's to be avoided because of past liberal positions. I'm a fan of neither, but I want to understand the "rules" here.

Well the first rule is to not compare apples to oranges through bumper-sticker generalities.

Work on that one for awhile, and then when you're ready, I'll give you the second rule. One by one, you can learn all of them - if you really want to.

[BillyBoy]

>> So Trump defenders say "he's evolved" ,but she's to be avoided because of past liberal positions. <<

>> I'm a fan of neither, but I want to understand the "rules" here. <<

I'm also a fan of neither, but the various candidates cheerleaders will always make an exception to the rules for their own candidate. For example, its an unforgivable sin for Rick Santorum to endorse Romney in 2008 when the only choices left were Romney, McCain, Huckabee (even though 95% of freepers on this very forum did the SAME THING as Santorum at that time, I remember it well). However, according to Carly defenders, its just fine and dandy for her to be tied to the hip of McCain and then become a top Romney advisor in 2008, because she's become "much more conservative" since then.