Skip to comments.
Donald Trump’s Plan for Your Taxes Might Be EXACTLY What He Needs to Win the White House
Conservative Tribune ^
| 5AUG2015
| Staff Writer
Posted on 08/10/2015 7:13:51 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: Jack Hydrazine
Wow, that’s not bad...I could handle $300.00 a year...
21
posted on
08/10/2015 7:33:40 AM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
("It's the hard working, tax paying citizens of the United States that are suffering...")
To: SuzyQue
Compare that to what you are paying now.
22
posted on
08/10/2015 7:33:42 AM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: rainee
Billary pandering with her free college crap today.”””
FREE to the student & thousands of felons & prisoners still incarcerated!!!
Hillary is just plain nuts.
$350 BILLION cost to taxpayers.
To: Jack Hydrazine
That’s not the point. Why replace one defective system for another?
24
posted on
08/10/2015 7:36:01 AM PDT
by
SuzyQue
To: SuzyQue
Seems to me it has to be the same as current progressive rate calculations. You are taxes 1% on the first 30000. 5% on the next 70000 and so on. Seems like that would need to be consistent with his plan for the very reason you mention.
25
posted on
08/10/2015 7:36:16 AM PDT
by
ilgipper
To: HarleyLady27
To: SuzyQue
I would think you pay 1% on the first 30k and 5% on the amount over 30k, etc.
27
posted on
08/10/2015 7:36:45 AM PDT
by
TNoldman
(AN AMERICAN FOR A MUSLIM/BHO FREE AMERICA. (Owner of Stars and Bars Flags))
To: Jack Hydrazine
28
posted on
08/10/2015 7:36:46 AM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(With the things that are about to come to light. People might just need a little old-fashioned.)
To: nhwingut
I just went through annual raises. Quite a few people get a small raise, especially those on the low end of the pay scale.
29
posted on
08/10/2015 7:37:29 AM PDT
by
SuzyQue
To: SuzyQue
It wouldn't work that way. The income between $30,000 and the next level would be taxed at the higher rate - the first $30,000 remains at 1%. So at $30,100, you would pay $305.00.
30
posted on
08/10/2015 7:37:54 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
(Heteropatriarchal Capitalist)
To: SuzyQue
The flaw in your logic is the time it would take you to get to the point where you’d be making more money.
31
posted on
08/10/2015 7:38:15 AM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: TNoldman
That would make a little more sense.
32
posted on
08/10/2015 7:38:30 AM PDT
by
SuzyQue
To: ridesthemiles
I know, crazy! That’s why Trump or someone else needs to get out there quick with tax plan...counter what Billary wants to tax you vs. what a tax plan will save you.
Just repeat $350 billion, over & over.
33
posted on
08/10/2015 7:38:37 AM PDT
by
rainee
(Her)
To: HarleyLady27
And if your under $30,000.00 what do you pay?
Probably nothing. Right now those earning nothing are eligible for the Unearned Income Tax Credit. That is a refund for not earning any money or paying any income taxes.
34
posted on
08/10/2015 7:39:20 AM PDT
by
Parmy
To: Jack Hydrazine
Well, this is still a progressive tax plan, just not steeply progressive.
To: Jack Hydrazine
36
posted on
08/10/2015 7:42:31 AM PDT
by
SuzyQue
To: Boogieman
Well, this is still a progressive tax plan, just not steeply progressive.And it would need an inflation adjuster. Remember, the original income tax was set at income over $3k because in the 1910s only the 1% made over $3k.
37
posted on
08/10/2015 7:42:36 AM PDT
by
chajin
("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
To: Jack Hydrazine
And while we are at it let’s completely eliminate the welfare state for both individuals and corporations - all of it - completely.
It is not the government’s job of taking care of the citizenry. Let the people of America take care of their fellow American.
Government’s real job is providing a safe and just environment in which to allow the rest of us to raise our families and run our businesses with minimal interference.
38
posted on
08/10/2015 7:43:17 AM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: ilgipper
How about charging everyone 10% at the federal level and 10% at the state level with the total tax liability for any one individual or corporation no more than 20%?
39
posted on
08/10/2015 7:45:02 AM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: Jack Hydrazine
It is necessary as it will disempower corrupt bureaucrats like Lois Lerner.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson