Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pearls Before Swine

It was probably in several locations.

Interesting that Clinton and Obama showed no interest in negotiating with Qadaffi. You would think that two peaceniks like Obama and Hillary would have agreed to negotiations to remove Qadaffi.

It’s like they wanted him dead, not just removed from governance.

But, that would only happen if they had a personal interest in Libya. Like if they wanted Qadaffi’s fortune.


23 posted on 08/13/2015 5:04:24 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: blueunicorn6

Not only his fortune, but the opportunity to shift his wealth and weaponry to the genesis of ISIS.

Why did we get NATO involved in Africa?

there was no security interest at stake?

They both colluded to get ISIS off the ground. On the heels of the Morsi ascension in next door Egypt, they were putting in place the first building blocks of the Caliphate.

And they are both guilty of treason.


24 posted on 08/13/2015 5:07:09 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: blueunicorn6
You would think that two peaceniks like Obama and Hillary would have agreed to negotiations to remove Qadaffi.

It’s like they wanted him dead, not just removed from governance.

As if, for instance, the Clintons had cut a deal with someone with a personal, family blood debt vendetta against Qadaffi, who would not only want him dead, but ruined, deposed, humiliated and raped? Yes, that could be it.

42 posted on 08/13/2015 12:21:22 PM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson