Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C. Edmund Wright

Erickson is not an impartial player. Nor is he a big voice, in my opinion. He is easily ignored. What’s he gonna do...drum up false accusations against someone else?

And, I’m not being intentionally snotty here, just honest — I never thought Erickson was all that. Ingraham smokes him. In fact, Billy Cunningham is more interesting.


58 posted on 08/14/2015 6:27:45 AM PDT by xzins (Don't let others pay your share; reject Freep-a-Fare! Donate-https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
Erickson is not an impartial player. Nor is he a big voice, in my opinion. He is easily ignored. What’s he gonna do...drum up false accusations against someone else? And, I’m not being intentionally snotty here, just honest — I never thought Erickson was all that. Ingraham smokes him. In fact, Billy Cunningham is more interesting.

That's not your normally well thought out post. You may think he's a tiny voice, and on talk radio, he is - but every candidate badly wanted to be at his event - and yes, it was HIS event, this weekend. Every one of them. THATS NOT INSIGNIFICANT. He's not just a talk host. That's almost an after thought to him and not his base of influence. Cunningham nor Ingraham are hosting all the candidates to my knowledge.

And there's no false accusations going on here. It's just a line in the sand on the Trump effect. I happen to think the truth about Trump is somewhere between Rush and EE.

63 posted on 08/14/2015 6:31:40 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson